YAKUGAKU ZASSHI
Online ISSN : 1347-5231
Print ISSN : 0031-6903
ISSN-L : 0031-6903
一般論文
実臨床におけるレジパスビル/ソホスブビル又はシメプレビル/ペグインターフェロン/リバビリン服用中のC型慢性肝炎患者のQOL評価
四十物 由香神山 紀子鴨志田 敏郎山元 俊憲向後 麻里
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2019 年 139 巻 11 号 p. 1427-1434

詳細
抄録

Recently, a clinical study using a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) showed that ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF)-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of IFN/ribavirin (RBV)-treated patients. However, no study has reported QOL assessment in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the QOL between patients treated with LDV/SOF and those treated with simeprevir (SMV)/peginterferon (Peg-IFN)/RBV to provide QOL information in clinical practice. The subjects were 169 patients with type I chronic hepatitis C or compensated cirrhosis C (Child-Pugh Grade A) who were treated with SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV or LDV/SOF in Hitachi General Hospital. The QOL was assessed ≥2 weeks after the start of administration using the Japanese version of the CLDQ (Kida et al., 2008 version). The total CLDQ score in the LDV/SOF group was significantly higher than in the SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV group (6.59 vs. 6.38, respectively, p=0.007). In particular, the scores for 4 domains (abdominal symptoms, systemic symptoms, activity, and emotional function) in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). Furthermore, the rates of patients scoring 7 (no symptom) on 8 items in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). In clinical practice, LDV/SOF-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of those receiving conventional treatment with IFN and RBV. This study may make it possible for health care professionals to provide clinical QOL information on LDV/SOF therapy to patients. Furthermore, QOL information may promote decision-making for treatment, leading to effective treatment.

著者関連情報
© 2019 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top