We have studied the susceptibility of nine representative causative agents of respiratory track infection, that were isolated in our hospital, to several new quinolones: ofloxacin (OFLX), norfloxacin (NFLX), lomefloxacin (LFLX), ciprofloxacin (CPFX) and tosufloxacin (TFLX). Whether a bacterial strain was resistant or susceptible was assessed by all the break point criteria given by three authorities, namely, the Japan Society of Chemotherapy (JSC), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) and the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Since the break point values varied slightly, but were generally 1-2μg/ml, the results also varied according to the criteria. For example, the suscetibility rates of
Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa against CPFX, when judged by the JSC criteria, were higher than those judged by the other criteria. From assessing susceptibility with these criteria, we considered that there should be special attention given to two bacterial species,
P. aeruginosa and
Staphylococcus aureus, because their susceptibility rates, which were generally low against almost all drugs and approximately 20-30%, were much different from the others. The antibacterial effect of TFLX against S. pneumoniae was the most potent, followed by OFLX and CPFX, in that order. Judging by any criterion, and even considering the tissue distribution of the drugs, NFLX and LFLX were expected to have no effect clinically. However, the susceptibity rates of the other six bacterial species, excluding the three mentioned above, was determined to be generally over 80% by all criteria. We considered that clinical decision-making using break point criteria was satisfactory for the therapeutic use of new quinolones in respiratory tract infection, when the infections is caused by
Moraxella catarrhalis,
Haemophilus influenzae,
Escherichia coli,
Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Enterobacter cloacae or
Serratia marcescens.
View full abstract