We made a comparative study of antimicrobial activity in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from blood culture. We divided
P. aeruginosa chronologically into 3 periods: Period I (before 1987), Period II (1989-1993), and Period III (1995-1999). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), MIC
50, and MIC
90 were measured to 13 antibiotics: piperacillin (PIPC), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (CFPM), cefozopran (CZOP), amikacin (AMK), tobramycin (TOB), meropenem (MEPM), imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS), panipenem/betamipron (PAPM/BP), levofloxacin (LVFX), ciprofloxacin (CPFM), sparfloxacin (SPFX), and norfloxacin (NFLX). In measurement MIC, we followed the Japanese Chemotherapy Association standard method. Intermediate and Resistant (IR) rates (%) were calculated according to NCCLS document (M 100-S 12) measuring MIC.β-lactam antibiotics, MIC
50 and MIC
90 were the same or 1-fold difference during Period I to Period III. Other antibiotics, MIC
50 and MIC
90 were the same or 2-fold difference during Period I to Period II. MIC
50 and MIC
90 at Period II and Period III marked changed strinking resistance. When we compared the IR rate (%) of Period I and Period II, we found increasing PIPC, IPM/CS, MEPM, CPFX, and NFLX, while we found decreasing CAZ, CFPM, CZOP, LVFX, AMK, and TOB. Comparing the IR rate (%) the Period II with Period III, we found a decrease in only PIPC and an increase in all other antibiotics. We concluded that, in addition to MIC (MIC
50 and MIC
90), the IR rate should be added to antibiotics susceptibility surveys of
P. aeuginosa. And it is necessity for empiric therapy to choice proper antibiotics, according to antibiotics susceptibility survey's result in each facility.
View full abstract