Background: Although intensive care is considered important for cardiovascular emergencies, large-scale evidence comparing outcomes by initial admission ward remains limited in Japan.
Methods and Results: Using the JROAD database, we identified patients hospitalized for cardiovascular emergencies after ambulance transport between April 2016 and March 2024 and classified patients by initial ward (intensive care unit [ICU], high care unit [HCU], or general ward [GW]). Deaths within 24 h were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, acute therapies, and hospital cardiologist staffing. Among 1,211,636 admissions, there were 323,220 (26.7%) deaths within 24 h; thus, 888,416 admissions (ICU, 212,059; HCU, 124,468; GW, 551,889) were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was 10.8%, 9.7%, and 12.2% for patients admitted to the ICU, HCU, and GW, respectively. Compared with the GW, the adjusted odds of death were lower for the ICU (odds ratio [OR] 0.718; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.703–0.734) and HCU (OR 0.928; 95% CI 0.906–0.950). A higher number of board-certified cardiologists was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.977 per additional board-certified cardiologist; 95% CI 0.976–0.978). Findings were consistent for acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism.
Conclusions: Higher-acuity admission and a higher number of cardiologists were independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality, supporting optimization of critical care access for high-risk cardiovascular emergencies in Japan.
抄録全体を表示