Agricultural chemicals play a crucial role in safeguarding crops, enhancing the production of high-quality agricultural products, and maintaining a steady market supply. Despite these benefits, agricultural chemicals hold the potential for adverse impacts on both human health and the environment. Thus, a precise understanding of their toxicity, persistence, and assurance of safety during usage, including the safety assessment of residues, is of paramount significance.
In the context of agricultural chemicals registration, collaboration among the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), the Ministry of the Environment (MOE), and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) occurs in cooperation with the Food Safety Commission (FSC). This collaboration involves inspections and evaluations conducted in compliance with regulations such as the Agricultural Chemicals Regulation Act and the Food Sanitation Act. Specifically, the MAFF assesses pesticide efficacy and impact on users based on the Agricultural Chemicals Regulation Act, while the MOE evaluates their influence on ecosystems, flora, fauna, and water quality. The FSC conducts assessments of food safety impacts under the Food Safety Basic Act to determine the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) and Acute Reference Dose (ARfD). These assessments draw from a diverse pool of toxicity data derived from studies using various animal species, encompassing acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive and developmental toxicity, to estimate ARfD, ADI, and potential risks.
Operating under the purview of the Food Sanitation Act, the MHLW establishes residue limits for pesticides in food, grounded in food health impact assessments and residue data derived from usage practices, thereby ensuring that health risks from agricultural chemicals remain minimal. Moreover, exposure assessment is conducted by comparing residue limits, estimated food intake, and the food health impact assessment conducted by the FSC to verify that intake remains below ADI and ARfD thresholds. The MOE then establishes usage guidelines based on these assessment outcomes, taking into account ADI and ARfD considerations.
The safety assessment of agricultural chemicals confronts challenges such as evaluating simultaneous exposure to multiple pesticides and identifying links between pesticides and specific conditions like developmental disorders or cancer. To address these challenges and enhance the efficiency of safety assessments, the development of novel assessment methods is warranted.
抄録全体を表示