Objective: This study was performed to demonstrate the clinical application of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) as a surgical treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in terms of both curability and maintenance of postoperative quality of life.

Methods: Seven patients diagnosed with PNETs underwent DPPHR from January 2011 to December 2021 at our institution. We investigated the clinical relevance of DPPHR based on the patients’ clinicopathological findings.

Results: The median operative time was 492 min, and the median blood loss was 302 g. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien–Dindo classification, and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding was observed in one patient. Pathological examination revealed a World Health Organization classification of G1 in six patients and G2 in one patient. Microvascular invasion was observed in two patients (29%); however, no patients developed lymph node metastasis or recurrence during the follow-up period. A daughter lesion was observed near the primary tumor in one patient. All patients achieved curative resection, and no tumor specimens showed positive margins.

Conclusions: DPPHR facilitates anatomical resection of the pancreatic head in patients with PNETs as well as detailed pathological evaluation of the resected specimen. Therefore, this surgical procedure is an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy or enucleation for patients with PNETs.

Objectives: To compare the characteristic competencies of public health nurses working for the older adult’s health and welfare in public administration (“PA”) with those at community general support centers (“CGSC”) in Japan.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey by mail for PA and CGSC public health nurses. A competency list that was developed to compare three groups (PA, CGSC experts with ≥5 years of experience, and CGSC newcomers with ≤2 years of experience) was used. The following characteristics were examined: (1) competencies acquired early after arriving at the CGSC, (2) competencies acquired through a certain amount of CGSC experience, (3) common competencies, (4) competencies that even experts lacked, and (5) competencies that the newcomers lacked.

Results: We examined the responses of 171 PA nurses, 185 CGSC expert public health nurses, and 165 CGSC newcomer public health nurses. The results of comparison of the three groups showed that (1) had no applicable items; (2) had nine items for individual support associated with preventive care management; (3) had 14 items including teamwork among three professionals (social workers, senior care manager, public health nurse)/other professionals and self-improvement; (4) had three items for community development, (5) had two items for individual support and 16 items for community development.

Conclusion: Initiatives for preventive care and coordination of care teams should be supported and suggested as characteristic competencies for CGSC public health nurses.