This investigation was made to compare the quality of the Japanese pear, 'Nijisseiki', as grown in Japan and California. Samples of fruit were gathered at normal fruit size at Fresno and Sacramento in California, and Tottori and Nagano in Japan.
Results were as follows :
1. In terms of climatic conditions, maximum and mean temperatures during the growing season were higher in California than in Japan, however, minimum temperature were lower than in Japan. Precipitation in Japan was markedly higher than in California with a monthly mean precipitation of about 100-150mm. Precipitation in California was very low. Consequently solar radiation in California was higher than in Japan, while relative humidity in Japan was higher than in California. 2. In sampling the fruit in both countries, an effort was made to select at normal fruit size. However, according to the Japanese fruit size classification, California fruit fulls in the L class; while the Japanese fruit fulls, in the 2L class. Therefore, the weight, length and diameter of fruit produced in Japan were larger than those in California. The D/L value was slightly higher in Japan than also in California, consequently the fruit in California was also slightly flatter than in Japan. Skin color was also different between Japan and California, however, variability among the four districts was considerable. Flesh hardness of California fruit was conspicuously higher than in Japan (Fresno 5.55kg/cm2, Sacramento 4.98, Tottori 2.21 and Nagano 3.00). The rate of squeeze decreased with increasing flesh hardness in fruit of California. The rate of squeeze was high in fruit of Japan, but there was no relationship between flesh hardness and rate of squeeze. 3. Sucrose and sorbitol concentrations in California fruit were conspicuously higher than in Japan (In Fresno 5.54 g /100ml, Sacramento 6.42, Tottori 3.05 and Nagano 2.64). Temperature differences between day and night, solar radiation, precipitation, etc., may have affected sucrose and sorbitol concentrations. Glucose and fructose levels were similar in both Japan and California. 4. Citric acid concentration of fruit produced in Japan was higher than in California. However, malic acid in California was higher than in Japan. Total acid was the same in both countries.
View full abstract