Since the Japanese university credit system was adopted in the 1940s as a part of the post-World War Ⅱ reforms, it has been criticized because of contradictions between the definition and actual practice. For example, although the Standards for Establishment of Universities stipulate that one credit shall normally be awarded for 45 hours of study, many surveys have revealed that students are gaining credits for significantly fewer study hours. Therefore, based on previous research, this article examined the Japanese university credit system and its ability to assure outcomes of undergraduate study.
The issues of the Japanese university credit system were examined at three levels. The first level was individual courses. At this level, whether a credit awarded to a student achieving learning outcomes corresponds to 45 hours of study was the point of discussion. More specifically, the appropriateness of out-of-class workloads and the way to set expected learning outcomes were examined. The second level was the curricula of universities. At this level, whether a bachelor degree awarded to a student achieving learning outcomes corresponds to 5,580 hours (= 124 credits) of study was questioned. As related topics, the allocation of credits to courses and the upper limit of credits that students can take per semester were discussed. The third level was the national system. At this level, whether the national rules enable universities to operate their credit system properly was considered, in relation to assuring outcomes of undergraduate study. For instance, the definitions for credit and credit awarding in the Standards for Establishment of Universities have been criticized because of their ambiguity and irrationality.
In the conclusion section, after giving some consideration to the impact of the expansion of online lessons, the importance of course / curriculum design based on study time is argued. If there is discrepancy between hours of study foreseen and the result of student surveys, it is necessary to review not only the instructional course designs but also the design of the curriculum for the courses. Assuring outcomes of undergraduate study will only be possible when such reviews are conducted regularly at universities.
View full abstract