This paper describes the relationship between the role of university educators and university evaluation measures from the perspective of the academic.
Within highly developed countries, the prestige of the academic profession has gradually decreased in recent years. Concomitant with this change, the priorities of scholarship have shifted from research to education, and the number of university teachers hired on a part-time basis has gradually increased.
In “Scholarship Reconsidered,” Ernest Boyer, proposes that the work of academics be divided into four overlapping categories : discovery, integration, application, and teaching. He offers “integration,”as a new category, in the hope that educators might concern themselves to a greater degree with the relationship between the discovery and application of knowledge. On higher education’s international stage, each university’s unique character requires that its educators be at the same time both specific and diversified in orientation. Because of this, many educators are at risk of loosing some of privileges of autonomy and curriculum management. Boyer recommends the creation of creative contracts that would serve as a link between the priorities of institutions and their academics.
The Japanese University Council has recommended that Japanese universities project themselves as one of three types of institution in the 21st century’s research university, a professional university, or a liberal arts university. Many Japanese universities are now working to meet this challenge. Within this environment of change, some university educators will have to assume different professional identities according to the kind of university with which they are affiliated.
Recent efforts to enhance the quality of Japanese universities have resulted in increased scrutiny of the work of campus educators. Today, for instance, 71 percent of Japan’s national universities now require class evaluations. University accreditation has also greatly expanded in importance, partly in an attempt to ensure that the quality of university educators is on par with that of most graduate schools. Additional external evaluation systems will be implemented at national universities in the year 2000. And, after three more years, the national university sector may be modified to reflect a new, more independent corporate system.
The evaluation of the roles of university educators in Japan will be expected to insure that higher education institutions maintain a high level of a quality.
View full abstract