In bone histomorphometry tetracycline double-labeling is a very useful method to analyze the bone dynamics. In 1981, Hori, et al. has reported four “patterns” of double labels after double-labeling in beagles, with or without presence of post-double-labeled mineralized bone layer and/or osteoid seam.
In this study, eight cases (four males and four females) were examined. Their age ranged from 22 to 71 years. The labeling schedule was on the tetracycline for 3 days, off for 7 days and on again for 3 days. The interval period between the second labeling and the biopsy was 5 to 13 days. Bone biopsy was done in the iliac bone. The undecalcified specimen was stained with the Villanueva bone stain and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. Then, with the Jung K-type microtome, it was cut at 5μm in thickness.
The fraction of pattern I, II, III and IV of doubly-labeled surface per total labeled surface was 37.1±15.5, 28.7±15.2, o and 1.6±2.6, respectively; while that of pattern I, II, III and IV of singly-labeled surface per total labeled surface was 8.1±7.5, 17.9±8.7, 0.3±0.7 and 6.3±5.5, respectively.
We have reported three “patterns” of double labels except for pattern III in four “patterns” and all four “patterns” of single labels in trabecular bone of eight human iliac bones. Furthermore, we have discussed its significance in bone histomorphometry. When the second interval period was longer than 7 days, the pattern I was of the largest, and when it was shorter than 6 days, the pattern II was of the largest in four “patterns”.
抄録全体を表示