The authors compared the utility of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with lumbar degenerative diseases.
A total of 178 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases were assessed according to the IPSS and JOA score. These included 32 females (F-group), 80 males without urinary tract lesions (Mn-group), and 66 males with urinary tract lesions (Mu-group). Patients with ≥8 points on the IPSS and ≤−3 points on the JOA score were classified as LUTS (+). Additionally, we investigated both storage and voiding symptoms using IPSS. Patients with ≥4 points from a possible maximum of 15 across 3 questions relating to storage and voiding symptoms on the IPSS were defined as symptom (+).
Among all 178 patients, LUTS positivity was detected in 85 patients (48%) by the IPSS and in 81 patients (46%) by the JOA score. In the F-group, 10 patients (31%) were LUTS (+) on both scoring systems. In the Mn-group, 33 (41%) and 39 patients (49%) were LUTS (+) on the IPSS and JOA score, respectively. Thus, there was good statistical correlation between the IPSS and JOA score.
However, a more detailed analysis of the findings revealed that the group defined as normal by JOA score had worse symptoms on the IPSS : 25% of the 178 patients, including 14% in the F-group and 22% in the Mn-group.
Moreover, IPSS clearly identified many cases with storage symptoms and many mixed cases with both voiding and storage symptoms associated with lumbar degenerative disease.
In conclusion, IPSS was considered to be a more sensitive and useful scoring system than the JOA score for evaluating LUTS associated with lumbar degenerative diseases.
View full abstract