The Journal of Functional Water
Online ISSN : 2759-551X
Print ISSN : 1348-2432
Volume 6, Issue 1
Displaying 1-4 of 4 articles from this issue
  • Toshiyuki Kawaguchi
    2011 Volume 6 Issue 1 Pages 1-9
    Published: April 30, 2011
    Released on J-STAGE: August 26, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • Masahiro Maruo
    2011 Volume 6 Issue 1 Pages 11-14
    Published: April 30, 2011
    Released on J-STAGE: August 26, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • Atsuo Iwasawa, Mika Furuta, Minoru Kanno, Takayuki Mokudai, Masahiro K ...
    2011 Volume 6 Issue 1 Pages 15-25
    Published: April 30, 2011
    Released on J-STAGE: August 26, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Washing and disinfection efficacy of a newly developed endoscope disinfection device CM-5, which was certificated as a medical device by the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry of Japan in May 2010, was examined in the following two points. That is, 1) antimicrobial and antiviral efficacy of strong acid electrolyzed water (SAEW) produced by CM-5, and 2) washing and disinfection efficacy of CM-5 under the conditions of clinical use. In the study of 1) in which 20 strains of 18 bacterial species, 3 fungal species, and 4 strains of 3 viral species were used, SAEW needed <5 min and <60 sec to kill Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium sporogenes, both of which are spore forming bacteria, respectively, and <30 sec to kill Cryptococcus neoformans, which is a capsulated fungus. Against any other pathogens, SAEW needed only < 5 to 15 sec to kill them. In the study of 2), each pathogen from 14 strains of 13 bacterial species, 3 fungal species, and 3 strains of 2 viral species was attached to both the inside and outside of an endoscope, and then the contaminated endoscope was subjected to the treatment of disinfection process of CM-5. As a result, efficacy against Helicobacter pylori was not evaluated because no H. pylori were detected even before the treatment. Against any other pathogens, the treatment of CM-5 exerted potent disinfectant efficacy enough to eliminate bacteria and fungi with 6 logarithmic reductions. In addition, no viruses were isolated after the treatment.   Considering the preliminary washing for endoscope as described in the “guideline for disinfection of endoscope”, the endoscope disinfectant device CM-5 is most likely effective for clinical use.
    Download PDF (710K)
  • Takayuki Mokudai,, Mitsuo Ikeda, Masahiro Kohno, Yoshimi Niwano
    2011 Volume 6 Issue 1 Pages 27-33
    Published: April 30, 2011
    Released on J-STAGE: August 26, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Attention has been paid to vanadium because of its antidiabetic action. There are a lot of natural water products whose sales point is to contain vanadium. However, in most cases, existing form of vanadium is not clear. There have been two methods developed for the differential determination of vanadium. One is graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry based on the extraction of vanadium(V) and vanadium(IV) with different solvents. The other is the speciation method by using high performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The present study demonstrated that an ion chromatography is very effective for the separation of vanadium(IV) and vanadium(V). If vanadium(V) is existed in aqueous samples, it can be reduced by electrolysis, resulting in the appearance of vanadium(IV). In addition, since electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrometry can be used to confirm the existence of vanadium(IV) based on the spectrum with eight signals, ESR spectrometry can detect the electrolysis-induced reduction of vanadium(V) to vanadium(IV). Therefore, we propose that the combination of these three methods is very useful for the determination and speciation of vanadium in water samples.
    Download PDF (366K)
feedback
Top