Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis for oral reconstructive surgery.
Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent oral reconstructive surgery at the Department of Oral Surgery, Hokuto Hospital was performed. The selected candidate predictive factors for surgical site infection (SSI) and remote infection (RI) were: duration of prophylaxis, sex, age, anemia, preoperative serum albumin (Alb), obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), performance status (PS) , duration of the surgical procedure, tracheostomy, mandibulotomy, mandibular reconstruction using a metal plate, prior radiation therapy, blood transfusion, and delayed postoperative ambulation.
Results: For SSI, significant factors on logistic regression analysis were Alb, PS, tracheostomy, and prior radiation therapy (p<0.05). For RI, PS (p<0.05) was a significant factor. Patients receiving only CEZ (cefazolin) for 24 perioperative hours did not have a significantly increased SSI rate when compared to those patients receiving long-duration prophylaxis. Prophylaxis with CEZ for 24 perioperative hours was generally considered optimal prophylaxis, but it may have increased the RI rate.
Conclusion: Antimicrobial prophylaxis appears to be controversial in a compromised host.
View full abstract