Evidence based practice considers patient preferences, resources, and practitioner 's expertise, in addition to the best research evidences. The formulation of clinical practice guidelines involves systematic collection of the research evidence and selection of the best-recommended evidence, considering patient preference, benefit balance, risks, and several more aspects. Therefore, clinical practice guidelines can be considered as a relevant body of evidence.
Recently "shared decision-making"has attracted a lot of attention worldwide. It involves sharing information regarding evidence (and clinical expertise), patient 's comprehension, expectation, and preference. “Informed consent" is comparable to “shared decision-making".
Informed consent is a process that obtains patient’s permission through one-way explanation of a practitioner. However, because a physical therapist has not learned knowledge of the clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making process, then "shared decision-making" is not reflected in clinical practice.
There are fewer opportunities for physical therapists to know more regarding clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. Considering the potential of these techniques, understanding the relevance of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making could become essential for physical therapists in the near future.
Here, we have explained the importance of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making and considered their possible application in clinical practice.
View full abstract