Objective: This study analyzed the impact of transfusion nurses on the observation and reporting system for adverse reactions to blood transfusion by comparing the enrollment status of transfusion nurses among institutions. We expected that the results would help clarify issues for strengthening the national hemovigilance system.
Methods: A self-administered, anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted at 1,791 healthcare facilities with ≥200 beds.
Results: Responses were received from 685 facilities (valid response rate 38%). Facilities with transfusion nurses on staff (229 facilities) tended to have higher rates of vital sign measurement than those without (456 facilities). Vital sign measurement rate significantly differed before (p<0.01) and at the end of transfusion (p<0.05), as did the use of the "List of Symptoms Items" (p<0.01) and "List of Diagnostic Items" (p<0.01). However, overall use rate of the "List of Symptom Items" was 82%, while the "List of Diagnostic Items" was only 55%.
Discussion: The rate of vital sign measurement was higher in facilities which employed transfusion nurses, suggesting that these nurses contribute to strengthening the system for detecting changes in patient condition at an early stage. Nationwide standardization of the reporting system for adverse reactions was identified as an issue.
View full abstract