-
Article type: Cover
2005 Volume 8 Pages
Cover1-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Index
2005 Volume 8 Pages
Toc1-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
App1-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Yo In'nami
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
1-20
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Rintaro Sato
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
21-30
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness for listening comprehension of listening once, twice, and three times without a pause, and listening once with a pause inserted. Seventy-two second grade Japanese senior high school students, whose English proficiency was low, participated in the experimental study. Thirty-seven students listened to the listening material once, twice, and three times, and every time they listened to the material they answered questions. Thirty-five students listened to the pause-inserted listening material once and answered the questions. The results showed that by listening twice they obtained the highest score, followed by three times, the pause-inserted version and listening just once. There was a significant difference between listening once and twice, but no significant difference between listening once and the pause-inserted version. Possible reasons for the results are discussed.
View full abstract
-
Rie KOIZUMI
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
31-50
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Mark Chapman
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
51-67
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
This paper reports how a major Japanese corporation conducts the testing of English proficiency for its employees. The main instrument used for assessment is the TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication). Despite some employees requiring both productive and receptive linguistic skills, the TOEIC is a discrete item test of listening and reading. Decisions made on the basis of TOEIC scores alone have been brought into question through the findings of studies comparing TOEIC scores with those of independent speaking and writing tests. Data generated by these investigations fail to support claims made for the TOEIC by ETS and indicate that Japanese corporations may be overly reliant on the TOEIC. It is suggested that the TOEIC needs to be supplemented with direct tests of speaking and writing, if companies are to make reliable decisions about the suitability of employees for positions requiring English proficiency.
View full abstract
-
Yuko HIJIKATA
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
68-85
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
The aim of this study is to clarify whether or not EFL learners' brilliant rhythm perception is advantageous for dividing spoken language into meaningful units, chunking during listening. One hundred and seven Japanese high school students were classified into three levels based on a rhythm perception test. As a result, the high level and the low level group's chunking test scores differed significantly. Further analysis revealed that regardless of the level of rhythm perception, the chunking scores decreased significantly when the speed increased while the passage length was constant and when the passage length increased but the speed remained the same. Therefore, the speed and the listening passage length affected the chunking test scores more than rhythm perception did. Moreover, a 2 (slower or faster speed) × 2 (short or long passage length) × 3 (the rhythm perception groups) three-way ANOVA revealed significant interactions. The results indicate that regardless of the level of rhythm perception, chunking scores decrease significantly if the speed becomes fast while maintaining the same length. Also, regardless of the rhythm perception level, chunking is more difficult in longer segments than in shorter segments, when the speed remains constant.
View full abstract
-
Masao KANAOKA
Article type: Article
2005 Volume 8 Pages
86-101
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
App2-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
103-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
104-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
105-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
106-107
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
108-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
109-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
110-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
111-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
111-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
111-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
112-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
113-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
114-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
115-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2005 Volume 8 Pages
App3-
Published: November 10, 2005
Released on J-STAGE: August 07, 2017
JOURNAL
OPEN ACCESS