Objective: I examined the predictive value of
the combination of three delayed recall tests to
distinguish 1) those with probable Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) from those within normal range,
and 2) those with Mild cognitive impairment 1
(MCI) from those within normal range. The data
from 90 visitors to a memory clinic in Tokyo
was used. I first examined patients clinically,
neuroradiologically, and excluded the mental and
neurological illness. AD was diagnosed according
to the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria 2, MCI according to
the criteria of Petersen et al.1. Normal must be free
from any disease examined above. Methods: After
the diagnosis, the baseline neuropsychological
tests were performed for all participants; the
Mini Mental State Examination3, Raven’s Colored
Progressive Matrices, the Stroop Test, a 10-words
list learning and recall test, a story recall test, and
the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. After 10
years, all patients were reassessed and diagnosed
again. Results: Of the MCI patients for follow-up
(n=29), 19 were converted to AD, while 5 not. One
died. 4 lost. All AD patients (n=30) remained as
AD. The combination of 3 delayed recall battery
provides clinically useful predictive values for
both AD and MCI in a memory clinics and dementia
research clinics.
View full abstract