We are going to consider a fixed significance level, exact, test of equality of three binomial proportions. At first, we carry out conditional and unconditional tests using three major test statistics and, then, compare the test sizes of them. It is observed that unconditional test is more powerful when the distribution of a test statistic is stable among conditional reference sets. However, as the discreteness of a test statistic on conditional reference set disappears, the behavior of conditional test becomes comparable to that of unconditional test. In this paper, we propose a modified statistic, which is based on the cumulative distribution of an original statistic on conditional reference set, and show that the unconditional test using the modified statistic is uniformly more powerful than the conditional test using the original statistic. Thus, we have no choice to adopt conditional test when it is possible to carry out unconditional test. We, also, propose another statistic, which is a slightly improved version of the modified statistic, and demonstrate the high performance of this statistic through numerical examples.
View full abstract