In an attempt to conduct a process evaluation of the accuracy control implemented for abdominal ultrasonographic mass surveys, a questionnaire was sent to 228 facilities of the National Federation of Industrial Health Organization (ZENEIREN). In addition, the performance of the members of the Tokyo Health Service Association, who practice abdominal ultrasonographic mass surveys in accordance with the judgment standards established by the association, was also studied. So, we would like to present certain findings obtained from such surveys. According to the questionnaires filled in by the ZENEIREN facilities, the obtained results are as follows:
Examination time: 7 ∼ 10 min; rate of digitalization of the ultrasonographic apparatus: 41.6%; rate of the double-checking conducted on the reading of ultrasonographic images: 100% (although the double-checking on the reading of the obtained images is conducted by both a medical technician and a physician at almost all the facilities, the degree of expertise that physicians can share is low); rate of the examinees who need to be thoroughly examined: 4.2% (among them, the percentage of examinees who underwent detailed examination: 60.4%); detection rate of malignant disorders: 0.02% or less (among them, early-stage cancer: 29.7%). But, the facilities which had a positive predictive value (PPV) accounted for only 25.6%. In the case of our association, the percentage of examinees who underwent detailed examination was 76.9%. The rate of cancer detection was 0.01% for the liver and the kidney, respectively, and the PPV for the kidney was 12.5%. In this study, it was apparent that the rate of follow-up examinations is very low. Therefore, the process evaluation is graded low.
View full abstract