Aim: To review the latest computer-aided diagnostic tools and methods for the screening of colon cancer by CT colonography (CTC).
Subjects: We analyzed the CTC DICOM data of 9 patients with colorectal cancers or adenomas more than 10 mm in size. All of the lesions could not be detected by the Siemens Syngo Colonography Polyp Enhanced Viewing system (PEV-negative lesions). The 9 patients had 29 polyps more than 3 mm in size, which included 8 cancers. All patients underwent bowel preparation with isotonic magnesium citrate, and CTC examination in the prone and supine positions was performed using 1,400 - 2,000 ml of room air for bowel distention.
Method: The prone and supine data of 9 patients were analyzed using Colon VCAR (GE Healthcare, WI). We compared the findings of this analysis with the clinicopathological findings.
Result: In all patients, 8 small (<=5 mm), 11 medium (6-10 mm) and 10 large (>=10 mm) polyps were found during the optical colonoscopic examination or surgery. The results of the Colon VCAR analysis showed that, when the response threshold was set to 5 mm, 2 PEV-negative lesions were detected in the supine position and 3 in the prone; further, when the threshold was set to 3 mm, 7 PEV-negative lesions were detected in the supine position and all 9 in the prone. At the response threshold of 5 mm, the detection sensitivity for all 29 lesions was 27.6% in the supine position and 20.7% in the prone; further, at the threshold of 3 mm, the sensitivity was 75.6% in the supine position and 89.7% in the prone. At the threshold of 3 mm, the detection sensitivity for 27 of the 29 polyps in the prone or supine positions was 93.1%; however, at this setting, an average of 4.0 false-positive diagnoses were made per series in the supine position and 2.6 in the prone.
Conclusions: With adequate preparation, bowel distention and different positions, the sensitivity of Colon VCAR in detecting polyps more than 3 mm in diameter at the response threshold of 3 mm was over 90%. This sensitivity is sufficient to allow the use of this technique in interpreting the CTC data for colon cancer screening. In addition, fecal tagging agents and digital cleansing techniques can be used not only to reduce the rate of false-positive diagnoses, but also to facilitate the detection of polyps buried under watery stools.
View full abstract