To implement farm land consolidation that takes into consideration mobilization of land for agricultural use and formation of land use order (planning subjects), the “Kande method” as a planning method of a comprehensive district plan is effective. The “Kande method” is composed of planning organization, planning composition and a set of investigations. This paper focuses its attention on planning composition, which is the second condition of the “Kande method”, and clarifies the mechanism of its effectiveness.
The second condition of the “Kande method” has the following three steps;
1) making up and examining a written investigation of self survey, 2) making up and examining a written plan of a pilot plan, and 3) making up and examining a written plan of a master plan (three-step type). On the contrary, there is another idea that it should have only two steps; in which the two steps above, making up and examining a written investigation of self survey, and a written plan of a pilot plan are merged. This paper examines and compares the experimental results of making a comprehensive district plan of the Nagao district in Kobe city, which uses the three-step type, with the Ozo district in Kobe city, which uses two-step type, and makes clear the points mentioned below.
(1) The Nagao district, which uses the three?step type, makes up a master plan which gets synthesis, consistency and effectiveness and accomplishes the planning subjects, but the Ozo district which uses two-step type, does not always accomplish them.
(2) The following three points are the reasons why the three-step type is effective. 1) District leaders and district inhabitants gain a comprehensive understanding of a district and are willing to make up a pilot plan during the process of plan making and discussing. 2) District leaders and district inhabitants recognize the planning subjects of a district, have a shared vision of the district, and assess development and make up frameworks for the land use plan. 3) District leaders and district inhabitants adjust differences of each plan from the viewpoint of the middle or long term, determine priorities of projects, and consent to land consolidation projects.
View full abstract