Upper extremity prosthesis can be divided into cosmetic, functional, work, and myoelectric. If a device is produced without considering the needs of the user, there is the risk of deviating from the original purpose in the ADL, among which I include life at home and at work, and dropout is assumed to occur in the worst cases. Now, over 90% of upper extremity prostheses are for cosmetic purposes, when it comes to prosthetic models produced in Japan. Under these present conditions, functional and myoelectric purposes do not reach 10%. In such a situation, when choosing an appropriate prosthetic model, it is necessary to think about supporting the user’s participation in adult society, and how, if possible, the prothestic can raise QOL at the same time.
View full abstract