Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of a method of referencing manuals using personal electronic devices by determination and comparison of the number of references to ward manuals and the number of incident reports.
Subjects and methods: The participants were 70 nurses who were using ward manuals. Three conditions were established: a control phase, in which only a Web version of the electronic manual was made available; an instruction phase, in which the nurses were instructed to perform tasks in compliance with the ward manual; and a device-use phase, in which the ward manuals could be viewed using personal electronic devices. The number of times the manuals were referenced and the number of incident reports during each phase were tabulated and analyzed using statistical methods.
Results: The median number of references to ward manuals per day (quartile deviation in parentheses) in each condition was as follows: 2 (0.75) in the control phase, 1.5 (1.13) in the instruction phase, and 3.5 (1.63) in the device-use phase. The number of references in the device-use phase was significantly greater than in the control and instruction phases (p < 0.05). The median number of incident reports per day (quartile deviation in parentheses) in each condition was as follows: 2 (1.25) in the control phase, 0.5 (1) in the instruction phase, and 1 (2) in the device-use phase. The number of incident reports in the instruction phase was significantly smaller than in the control phase (p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Improving accessibility increased the number of times ward manuals were referenced, and the findings suggested that the number of incident reports decreased with instruction to perform repeated tasks in compliance with the manuals.
View full abstract