This article, combining findings of our previous work and new observations, analyzed the results in text-evaluation and reflective comments by 16 regular participants in 15-week writing course that offered text-analyzing tasks as one of its major activities, considering the learners' academic standings, learning experiences and various cultural/environmental backgrounds to identify possible influential factors on schema formation and develop resources and activities to assist it. Thirteen learners gave a correct judgment, and 9 of them based their judgments on reasonable internalized standards on style, organization, length of sentence, size of paragraph, and clarity in expression and argumentation. The following were observed in the more successful learners: 1) they had a set of well-stated, ordered standards of good writing with a priority on organization and argumentation, 2) were aware of common features their Japanese learning had with their experiences and also of its implications on their achievements in research, and 3) have specific expectations for the process of learning. While text-analyzing tasks were useful both for the more and the less successful learners, the latter were expected to be benefited from exposure to reflections by others. Learners' comments will be usefully incorporated into resources for the teaching of academic writing.
View full abstract