The β-model is known to give a clear-cut description of the intermittent structure of fully developed turbulence. By considering the dynamics of the eddy breaking in the β-model theory, Kida [Prog. Theor. Phys. 67 (1982) 1630] showed that in the cascade process of disintegration of eddies the total volume of eddies (active regions) after a disintegration is greater than that before, nevertheless since smaller eddies break down faster, the mean volume occupied by eddies decreases with their size, which is just the characteristics of the intermittent structure of turbulence. Later, Mori and Fujisaka [Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 2180] proposed another model, which is similar to the, β-model, to criticise Kida's theory. In their model, however, there are at least two fundamental mistakes found, namely, misunderstanding of the notion of intermittency of turbulence and overlooking of the lifetime of eddies in calculation of the energy spectrum. Here these fatal mistakes are explained by comparing the two theories in the hope that they would reconsider their model.
View full abstract