The concept of revelation is one of the most important concepts for theologians; how they think about it determines the direction of their theology. After the First World War, German-born theologian and philosopher of religion Paul Tillich stood between two theological movements in terms of revelation: liberal theology, which considers revelation as a human possibility, and dialectical theology, which considers it as the word of God and stresses the "infinite qualitative distinction" between the human and the divine. Tillich was not satisfied with either interpretation of revelation, so he proposed a third alternative. He defined revelation as a “breakthrough (Durchbruch) of the unconditioned into the conditioned.” Here, we show how Tillich overcame both liberal and dialectical theology and we explore the meaning of his concept of “breakthrough” by analyzing his understanding of the dynamic mechanism of revelation (natural revelation and supernatural revelation). Our research clarifies that the revelation as “breakthrough” intends a conversion of our existence and, in that sense, Tillich’s interpretation has something in common with existential philosophy.
View full abstract