Purpose: Cotton roll is widely used in dentistry for moisture control and isolation. However, cases of airway obstruction due to aspiration of the cotton roll have been reported, and some cases have even resulted in death. In this study, we developed an anti-aspiration gauze roll (AAGR) by attaching a thread to the gauze roll as an alternative to conventional cotton roll to prevent aspiration and forgetting to remove the cotton roll.
Methods: A water absorption test was conducted to evaluate the anti-moisture ability. Three types of prototypes, large (300×30 mm), medium (250×30 mm), and small (150×30 mm), were prepared according to the size of gauze used. The length of the cotton yarn was 300 mm. An in vitro water absorption test was conducted in accordance with the test method stipulated in the standards for medical gauze and medical cotton established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to evaluate the moisture control ability of AAGR. Each specimen (n=10) was immersed in 25°C distilled water for 3 minutes, left on a net for 1 minute, and weighed. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA was performed using statistical analysis software, followed by multiple comparison tests using the Tukey HSD test. The significance level was set at 5%. A clinical evaluation was conducted by surveying dentists about the usability of AAGR in clinical use. In the clinical evaluation, dentists were asked to use AAGR instead of cotton roll in clinical situations and complete a questionnaire. AAGR (large) was used for adult patients, and AAGR (small) was used for pediatric patients. The survey items included treatment details, water absorption capacity and speed, gauze portion size, gauze thread length and thickness, ease of use, and expectations for preventing aspiration.
Results: In the water absorption test, there was a statistically significant difference in the amount of water absorbed among each group: the amount in descending order was AAGR (large), control group, AAGR (medium), and AAGR (small). In the questionnaire survey, the results for adults showed that all items were rated as equal to or better than the conventional cotton roll, but the results for children showed that there were areas for improvement regarding water absorption volume, water absorption speed, thickness, and ease of use.
Conclusion: The results of the water absorption test showed that AAGR (large) absorbs more water than cotton roll and has superior moisture control ability. The use of AAGR is expected to prevent both forgetting to remove moisture control tools, and their accidental ingestion or aspiration.
抄録全体を表示