Originally it is at the beginning of the from the latter half of 18th century to 19th century, and the lied is common at the point where all use Indo-European languages for with a thing established in Germany, Italy, France, the U.K., Russia on the language side. Therefore, various problems to receive are thought about by a language side with a property different at all at least Indo-European languages and Japanese when I declare a lied in Japanese.
At first it is Japanese, and pitch and duration are particularly important whereas intensity and timbre are particularly important by the Indo-European languages when they catch an articulation from the situation of the person of utterance. Japanese is a pitch accent, but, as for this, the Indo-European languages is accepted, for example, in an accent by points that a stress accent is common. From the situation that audiance, as a viewpoint to be deep, and to be concerned with hearing information processing in the cerebrum such as so-called recognition, understanding, (1) syllable structure, (2) the kind of the syllable, (3) rhythm and the mora characteristics of words are important.
(1) As for the Japanese syllable structure, V generally becomes the nucleus and is /CV/ structure putting C one in front of V.However, the syllable structure of Indo-European languages is different in the point where we can employ plural consonants in front and behind V which is a nucleus.
(2) Japanese is a language of open syllable, where an ends in by a vowel sound of the word in many cases. In contrast, Indo-European languages is a language of closed syllable where the end of the word ends in by a consonant in the case of most. (3) It is a language of mora-timed rhythm, and Japanese has mora as the rhythm unit of distance. However, mora in a Japanese meaning does not exist because Indo-European languages is a language of syllable-timed rhythm. On the other hand, there is variety of the strength and weakness rhythm in the poem method conveyed for a language of Indo-European languages for a long time, and spondee, iamb, trochee, pyrrhic, anapæst, dactyl, double pyrrhic, tribrach,pæon is distinguished.
It was different from Japanese in various points by the Indo-European languages and would speak that there was the big ditch which was not easily exceeded among both in an accent called prosody, syllable structure, mora particularly as discussed in the above.
View full abstract