Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan
Online ISSN : 2185-517X
Print ISSN : 0038-0830
ISSN-L : 0038-0830
Volume 3, Issue 2
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
  • Yoshibumi TOMODA, Toshio SENSHU
    1956 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 41-50
    Published: December 10, 1956
    Released on J-STAGE: March 01, 2011
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    1) If a unit gravity is represented by Dirac's unit function δ(χ), and if the subterranean mass distribution that is responsible for it is eχpressed by Φ(χ), the subterranean mass distribution for a given gravity distribution g(χ) is given by
    ρ(χ)=∫g(χ′)Φ(χ-χ′)dχ′ .
    The function Φ(χ) is, according to the potential theory, represented by
    Φ(χ)=1/4π2κ2e|ω|Deiωχdw
    where, D represents the depth of the plane at which the mass is assumed to be condensed and k2 the gravitational constant. The above integration does not converge unless the wave number w has an upper limit. Since it is reasonably considered that gravity variations having shorter wave lengths are due to masses situated at shallower depths, we need not take into account those if we are interested in masses at greater depths. Thus we can reasonably impose an upper limit to the wave number which will be denoted byΩ. Then the response functionΦ*(χ) is written as
    The mass distribution p*(χ) for g(χ) is therefore given by
    ρ(χ)=∫g(χ′)Φ*(χ-χ′)dχ′
    This amounts to determine the mass distribution corresponding to g*(χ) instead of tog(χ). Where g*(χ) is such that its spectrum is the same with that of g(χ) for|ω|<Ω, and is zero for |ω|>Ω. Another characteristic of g*(χ) is that it satisfies
    ρ(χ)=∫g(χ)-g*(χ))2dχ-amin..
    φ*(χ) introduced above is the response function for unit gravity δ*(χ)=sinΩχ/πχ.
    2) If the gravity variation along the earth's surface is considered to be periodic, we can use Fourier series instead of Fourier transform. δ*(χ)=sin2M+1/2/2π·sin /2χ is the unit gravity in this case. The mass distribution φ*(χ) for gravity δ*(χ) is given by
    Φ*(χ)=1/2π2{1/2 +MΣm=1 emD cos mx}
    Here, M is the upper limit of the wave number.The mass distribution for gravity, g(χ) is given by
    ρ*(χ)=∫0g(χ′)φ*(χ-χ′)dχ′ .
    3) If the gravity variation along the earth's surface is considered to be periodic and its values are given at intermittent points distributed at an equidistant interval, the unit gravity δ(χ)=sin{(2N+1)/2}χ/(2Nsin(1/2)χ will be used. Here 2N is the number of sampling points.
    Response function φ(χ) for gravity δ(χ) is
    φ(χ)=1/2πκ2N{1/2+N-1 Σ m-1 e cos mχ+1/2eND cos }
    and the mass distribution corresponding to gravity g(χ) is
    ρ(χ)=2N Σ s=1 gsφ(χ-Sπ/N),
    where gs is the values of gravity at the sampling points. p(χ) is the overlapping sum of response function values multiplied by gs. The results thus obtained are identical to that of Tsuboi's Fourier series method. The upper limit of wave number, in this case, depends on the numbers of sampling points.
    If we are to carry out “low pass : high cut” operation, we can use unit gravity δ(χ)* instead of δ(χ) where
    δ(χ)=sin2n+1)/2/N sin1/2χ .
    The response function φ(χ) is 1/2πκ2N(1/2+n Σ s-1 emD cos mχ .
    The mass distribution ρ(χ) is ρ(χ)=2N Σ s=1 gsφ*(χ-Sπ/
    Download PDF (882K)
  • Takeo MATSUDA
    1956 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 51-54
    Published: December 10, 1956
    Released on J-STAGE: September 07, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    In order to calibrate the accuracy of the North American Gravimeter AGI-108, a series of observation was carried out in the neighborhood of the Geological Survey of Japan. The results are summarized as follows: 1) The probable error of the North American Gravimeter AGI-108 is about±0.05 mgal. 2) The accuracy is not correlate with the amount of the difference of observed gravity value. 3) It seems that the “ drift ” is not always proportional to the interval of the measured time. Sometimes the scale reading have been jamped up by the shocks of the car and other disturbances.
    Download PDF (1973K)
  • Eiichi NISHIMURA, Jun'ichiro MIYAKOSHI
    1956 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 55-58
    Published: December 10, 1956
    Released on J-STAGE: September 07, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Geomagnetic observations with the self-recording magnetic torsion balance on one side and with two magnetic variometers of geomagnetic declination on both sides of the Kitan Strait were made to study the geomagnetic effect caused by ocean tides. The effects were clearly observed and those are reasonably explained as caused by the dynamo effect of the oceanic tidal current of the Strait.
    Download PDF (3499K)
  • Geographical Surveg Institute
    1956 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 59-62
    Published: December 10, 1956
    Released on J-STAGE: September 07, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    After completion of the survey in Hokkaido, Tohoku and Kanto districts the second order magnetic survey was extended over the central part of Japan, i.e., Chubu and Kinki districts, where 150 second order magnetic stations were newly established in 1955, besides 37 thired order magnetic stations in the Izu peninsula. In the middle part of the area, anomaly is not distinct, while the geomagnetic anomaly is most remarkable in the Fuji volcanic zone, where the values of anomalies amount to several thousands of gammas.
    Download PDF (2835K)
  • 1956 Volume 3 Issue 2 Pages 63-66
    Published: December 10, 1956
    Released on J-STAGE: September 07, 2010
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (683K)
feedback
Top