In order to understand the concept of peace within the context of action, this paper proposes a new definition, “dynamic peace” as opposed to “static peace.” With this definition, people can grasp the meaning of peace in a more realistic way. Dynamic peace is based on two concepts: process and direction. These concepts broaden the concept of peace and encourage society and its citizens to seriously question what is required for their lives: conflict transformation.

“Process” refers to “place” and it corresponds to both time and space. Process is essential in conflict transformation and peace work because both need to be dynamic in their movement. The concept of “direction” highlights society’s questioning of the value of peace. This study examines the importance of a “peaceful spirit” that is accompanied by a “critical mind,” in addition to the “actors” who play the role of dynamic peace workers. This new perspective transforms traditionally defined peace (static peace) into the new concept of dynamic peace.

With this new definition, this paper proposes a practical approach to peace work using the arts. Process liberates peace, and direction demands that we question our values continuously. Within this approach, “dynamic art” can be defined as “art that reveals and highlights conflict.” This arts-based approach is enriched by “creative dialogue,” and its actors become peace workers who are in essence “citizen artists.”

The analysis of this work is based on the methods and theories of John Paul Lederach and Johan Galtung, who are both peace and conflict scholars and have written books on the arts in society. Also, artists such as Makoto Oda and Peter Brook have also created important work focused on the relation between the arts and society. It is very clear that there must be active feedback between the arts and members of society in order for dynamic peace to be successfully achieved.