卒前医療者教育に職業教育の視点が含まれているだろうか．学生は卒前教育を受け，その知識と技能と倫理観を卒後のトレーニングで職場の中で学び続け，専門職業職者としてその役割を患者さんや地域住民という人たちに貢献していくことで，自分の幸せを得ていく．そのために，卒前教育では，学生が卒後のトレーニングとそのあとの生涯学習で学び続ける資質と能力を育てていかなければならない．人は，職業を通じ，自分の能力を他者貢献・社会貢献のために発揮し，他者や社会の役に立つことで生計を立てていく．自分の持っている知識と技能を何の目的に，どのように使うかという職業倫理が重要となる．人が社会とどのようにかかわり，社会に貢献するとはどのようなことかを卒前教育は教えていく必要がある．

This paper focuses on the example of NHK’s welfare program Heartnet TV

（NHK ETV）, for reexamining the public broadcaster’s role of incorporating

“silent voices” via social media. An important issue for rethinking public broadcasting

journalism of the digital era is to connect various types of marginalized

audiences’ “silent voices” to the wider public sphere. In this respect, many studies

suggest the importance of examining democratic process through the interaction

between broadcasting and social media.

　　Nevertheless, few empirical studies examine how broadcasting journalistic

practices could be restricted by incorporating “silent voices” via social media.

For this reason, this paper examines whether the existing television journalism

could both incorporate various voices and represent them in words easily

understood by members of the wider society. Heartnet TV is a challenging journalistic

practice that tries to use minorities’ voices on social media for representing

social reality to the wider public.

　　This paper conducted qualitative discourse analysis by referring to program

contents and audiences’ interpretations in the official BBS and Twitter

regarding two of the program series: ⑴ the series regarding the Sagamihara

Disabilities Murder（ 2016）, which was a hate crime against people with mental

disabilities and ⑵ NHK’s Suicide Prevention Campaign “Television for Surviving”

（since 2014）, which has been projected for reducing young people’s suicides.

Many opinions regarding these program contents appeared in social

media from people affected by problems.

　　Finally, this paper concludes that there is a contradiction between both of

the two roles mentioned above: incorporating various opinions and representing

its complex reality in words at the same time. This result also suggests a structural

problem regarding a democratic process centered around autonomous

audiences and shows revising the traditional sender-receiver relationship on

complex media landscape as a task.