This study focus on the development planning of sandbank area utilizing the approach of public participation and picks up the case of “Eco Shezidao” of Shezidao area, Taipei city. This study aims at clarify the characteristics of ining extra floor area. Actually, developers use several institutions of “Eco Shezidao” especially focus on the aspect of urban plan and business plan. Besides, this study analyzes the process of public participation of the development planning of “Eco Shezidao”. Finally, this study evaluate and summarize outcome of the planning process of “Eco Shezidao” from the aspect of public participation.

抄録全体を表示

 “Transfer of development right (TDR)” has been considered as an important institution for the urban regeneration since recently. The TDR system is first released in 1990 in Taipei city. Today, there are many TDR institutions in Taipei, Taiwan. The important point is that all of them could be utilized overall the Taipei city, so the integrity between TDR and existing urban plan is important.
 We focus on the TDR institution for conservation of historical district in Dihua Street (DS), Taipei city, Taiwan. Previous studies have revealed the basic system and its historical background of the establishment of this institution. This study focuses on the analysis of the characteristic of sending site as well as receiving site of DS-TDR form the view of urban plan. Besides, we also analyze the meaning of the latest detail plan (revised) which is released Jun. 2016.
 We estimate the achievement of DS-TDR from both the view of sending site and receiving site based on the latest data. We consider that bias of the amount of receiving site exists, most receiving sites are located in Zhongshan district. What' more, although Datong district is also designated as the priority area for receiving site, there are only few cases as a matter of fact. The integrity between DS-TDR and existing urban plan is secured by the double-deliberation system of Taipei city urban regeneration committee and Taipei city urban design committee, TDR can still give impact to the nearby environment of receiving site. It will be a solution to integrate DS-TDR into the new type of urban plan TDR: Floor area bank. Actually, it is proposed as an article in the latest detail plan (revised) in 2016, however the residents of Dihua Street are still fighting against that. Based on our estimation of macro level about the integrity between urban plan and DS-TDR, we consider that the preservation is successful from the view point of sending site. On the other hand, the achievement of designated receiving site is not effective from the view point of receiving site.
 Besides, we consider although the preservation is successful and those historical building is now revitalized as community space, a huge amount is provided as the reward for it based on our estimation of micro level about the integrity between urban plan and DS-TDR.

抄録全体を表示

本稿は1895～1945年に目本の統治下にあつた台湾の都市計画の特徴について最大の都市である台北を例にとって取りまとめたものである。
台北の市区改正の実施の契機は、不衛生な都市環境の改善であり、そのために下水道の敷設と道路の改良が実行された。それを推進したのは、後に日本内地の都市計画の発展に大きな功績を残す後藤新平であり、下水道敷設のプランをつくったのは日本の近代上下水道の基礎をつくったパルトンであった。
1932年に郊外地の開発を目的とする近代的な都市計画が策定された。そのプランは公園道 (ブールバール) を重視し、新市街地の軸線として用いている。1937年の都市計画法制度の整備以降、土地区画整理により、新市街の開発が着手されている。
戦後、中華民国になってからの台北都市計画の街路、公園は戦前のプランがほぼそのまま継承されている。また法令もそのまま採用され、用途地域、土地区画整理など、制度而でも今日の台湾の都市計画に影響を与えている。

抄録全体を表示

西門町は、現在でも有数の繁華街であり、その歴史はが近代化する過程で始まった。西門町の生まれる前の台北にはダイトウテイ、バンカと呼ばれる自然発生的集落とそれらを管理する台北府城のいわゆる三市街が分離して成立していた。日治期の近代都市計画はこれらを統合し、その副産物として新しい商業中心地区、西門町が形成された。本稿では当時の都市状況を示す文献の調査とともに、この歴史的な都市変容をスペース・シンタックスを用いて分析した。その結果、三市街が分離して成立した原因が移動効率上の要求ではなかったこと、効率性の視点が都市に導入されて初めて西門町が成り立ったことが見出された。そして、西門町の誕生に象徴的に現れていたことは、近代化によって“儀礼的”に都市が構成されていた時代から“効率性”が都市を構成する時代に移り変わったことであったことが結論として示される。

抄録全体を表示

本研究は大稲埕地区における歴史保全ツールとしての容積移転(TDR)について、2007年～2014年の運用プロセスとその変遷に着目して送出敷地への影響面から成果を評価し、今後の課題を明らかにすることを目的とする。研究方法としてTDRの制度及び運用プロセスについて関係者へのヒアリング調査の他、及び国のTDR制度の発展について文献調査を行った。分析の枠組みとして歴史保全のハード的側面(質・量)、ソフト的側面(コンテンツ、社会経済組織)を設定し、それぞれの観点から影響要因を検討した。その結果、大稲埕歴史風貌特定専用区のTDRにおける重要な要因として、歴史調査の義務付け、建物改修の5段階チェック、都市設計審議会の弾力的運営、柔軟な制度対応、容積ボーナスの5点が抽出された。特に容積ボーナスは強力なインセンティブとしてハード的側面の歴史保全に大きな成果を上げる一方、ソフト的側面の保全には課題が発生している。インセンティブ設計を容積ボーナスに頼っていたことが歴史保全において歪みを生じていると考えられ、容積ボーナスの再設計、容積以外のインセンティブの考案、規制の検討が必要である。

抄録全体を表示

The goal of this study is to engage in historical analysis concerning the park plan of Taipei City under the Japanese reign, through the viewpoint of "park idea induction". The analysis Result shows the process of park plan idea of Taipei city can be divided into the following 4 stages: 1. At the primary stage the establishment of the parks of Taipei City shall include two kinds of parks. 2. The 1918 park plan was referred to American park plan, and to establish the park plan close to western standards. 3. The urban plan of Taipei City In 1932 induced in American park system plan approach. 4. After the establishment of urban laws in, the park planning standard of Japan were induced in to engage in construction of small park.

抄録全体を表示

 “Transfer of development right (TDR)” has been considered as an important institution for the urban regeneration since recently. The TDR system is first released in 1990 in Taipei city. Today, there are many TDR institutions in Taipei, Taiwan. The important point is that all of them could be utilized overall the Taipei city, so the integrity between TDR and existing urban plan is important.
 In this study, we first summarize several TDR institutions including Monument TDR, Urban plan TDR and Dihua Street TDR in Taipei city. Then we make clear the position and characteristic of TDR within the existing urban plan system. Then, we focus on compare the difference of new type of Urban plan TDR called Floor area bank (FAB) started in Taipei since 2014 with previous TDR. We first clarify the system of Floor area bank in Taipei city and the reason why it was established as the substitute of existing TDR institution. The difference between FAB-TDR and existing urban plan TDR is that, by donating land for public facility to Taipei city government, developers can get floor area same as the value of that land in the past. However, developers should pay the “Floor area fee” to the “Floor Bank” (Taipei city government) to get the floor area, and the amount of floor area will be decided by the “Urban design committee of Taipei city” based on the application of developer.
 We consider that all TDR institution is a kind of instrument for obtaining extra floor area. Actually, developers use several institutions for obtaining extra floor area including TDR and other institutions, for example, “Bonus floor area” institution is also one of that. However, the difference between TDR and Bonus floor area is that the floor area acquired from TDR is permanent. To protect the right of accepting site of TDR, certificate of TDR will be issued by Taipei city government. Besides, accepting site will also be recorded in the online zoning system of Taipei city.
 We then make clear the characteristic of FAB-TDR by operating the actual utilization cases. From the macro level, FAB-TDR actually solves the issues of unbalanced location of receiving site in the previous TDR institutions by operating total volume control. From the micro level, we can see how urban design committee plays an important role on controlling the nearby community of receiving site. What' more, by operating the evaluation of “Floor area fee” and the deliberation of urban design committee, it shortens the process of using FAB-TDR. Basically, it takes about 8 months.
 Finally, we summarize the key factor of the success of FAB-TDR and summarize the issues of it today. From the viewpoint of Taipei city government, FAB-TDR should consider about to provides some incentive for the user. From the viewpoint of user (developer), the cost of FAB-TDR is too expensive. From the viewpoint of appraisal, appraisal method of “Floor area fee” should be modified.

抄録全体を表示

The specific gravity of the row house in Kaohsiung area is high in Taiwan. This study collected the completion confirmation drawing of“To-tein house-traditional row house in Taiwan-” (161 housing developments, 6417 units) built in 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997, 2002 and 2007. The research analyzed the building arrangement and dwelling unit plan by year distinction / district distinction / area distinction and access form distinction.
As a result, this paper clarified the variety of access form, access space, dining-living room type, stairs form and stairs position was increasing and this selectivity was rising. Also, with the change to the year distinction this paper clarified the difference by the access form (enter directly type / arcade type / front yard type) was remarkable.

抄録全体を表示