To the comment and criticism by the inquirer on the article concerned, the author has truthfully answered as follows:
1) To the former query on a distinction between a sculpture and a openwork transom by the inquirer, the description of the previous text has been rectified on the hierarchy in various edifices within the Ooku Gotenmuki, under the appropriation of the inquirer's argument.
2) Against the latter query on Kin-un Sunago and Kin Sunago as a finish of the ceilings, the author's judgement has been rather appropriate by reference to supplemented pictorial diagrams indicated in the text and notes of the previous article.
3) The conclusion of the previous article remains to be effective in spite of its refinement owing to the comment and criticism by the inquirer.
