Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Online ISSN : 2186-1005
Print ISSN : 1341-1098
ISSN-L : 1341-1098

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Aortic Annulus Diameter Measurement: What Is the Best Modality?
Mitsuhiro YanoKunihide NakamuraHiroyuki NagahamaMasakazu MatsuyamaMasanori NishimuraToshio Onitsuka
著者情報
キーワード: aortic annulus diameter, modality
ジャーナル オープンアクセス 早期公開

論文ID: oa.11.01727

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the most suitable method to measure the aortic annulus diameter.
Patients and Methods: Fifty-five patients, who had undergone aortic valve replacement at Miyazaki University Hospital between April 2008 and May 2011, were included in this study. The maximum diameter of the sizing tool that could be inserted into the left ventricle through the annulus had been predicted, based on the diameter measured by each modality. Agreement with surgery and each imaging modality, namely transthoracic echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography and contrast angiography, were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: The predicted aortic annulus diameter, based on the diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography and contrast angiography, was 20.3 ± 2.50, 23.9 ± 3.19, and 23.5 ± 3.55 mm, respectively, whereas, the diameter measured at surgery was 23.7 ± 2.99 mm. Predicted aortic annulus diameter measured by multidetector computed tomography best agreed with that measured at surgery.
Conclusion: We conclude that the aortic annulus diameter, measured by multidetector computed tomography, is the best modality to measure the aortic annulus diameter.
著者関連情報
© 2012 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top