Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Online ISSN : 1347-5215
Print ISSN : 0918-6158
ISSN-L : 0918-6158
Regular Articles
The Role of Interleukin-19 in Contact Hypersensitivity
Yasuyuki FujimotoTakashi FujitaNobuyuki KuramotoMitsuru KuwamuraTakeshi IzawaKazuhiro NishiyamaNatsuho YoshidaHidemitsu NakajimaTadayoshi TakeuchiYasu-Taka Azuma
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2018 Volume 41 Issue 2 Pages 182-189

Details
Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-19 is a member of the IL-10 family of interleukins and is an immuno-modulatory cytokine produced by the main macrophages. The gastrointestinal tissues of IL-19 knockout mice show exacerbated experimental colitis mediated by the innate immune system and T cells. There is an increasing focus on the interaction and relationship of IL-19 with the function of T cells. Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is T cell-mediated cutaneous inflammation. Therefore, we asked whether IL-19 causes CHS. We investigated the immunological role of IL-19 in CHS induced by 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene as a hapten. IL-19 was highly expressed in skin exposed to the hapten, and ear swelling was increased in IL-19 knockout mice. The exacerbation of the CHS response in IL-19 knockout mice correlated with increased levels of IL-17 and IL-6, but no alterations were noted in the production of interferon (IFN)γ and IL-4 in the T cells of the lymph nodes. In addition to the effect on T cell response, IL-19 knockout mice increased production of inflammatory cytokines. These results show that IL-19 suppressed hapten-dependent skin inflammation in the elicitation phase of CHS.

Macrophages are pivotal cells in the innate immune system. During the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, macrophage organize the first host reaction to tissue invasion.1) Macrophages activated by effector T cells, as well as directly stimulated by infected pathogens, function in the pathogenesis of some kinds of inflammatory diseases.2) Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory disease of the skin.3) ACD is induced by frequent exposure to foreign substances such as metals, cosmetics, drugs and plant materials.4) In the pathogenesis of ACD, many types of immune cells, including keratinocytes, macrophages, T cells, and B cells, play important roles in the initiation and termination mechanisms of ACD.5) Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) as a mouse model of ACD has been used for two decades. CHS consists of two distinct parts.6) The first is a sensitization part, which is primed by the application of a hapten to the abdominal epidermis. Thereafter, the hapten-carrier complex is taken up by dermal dendritic cells and Langerhans cells. Langerhans cells can move from the epidermis to the draining lymph nodes, where the hapten-carrier-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complex is presented to naïve T cells. Proliferated effector T cells move out of the draining lymph nodes to the blood. The second part, called the elicitation phase, is initiated after re-sensitization of the epidermis to the same hapten. Effector T cells produce cytokines, such as interferon (IFN)γ and interleukin (IL)-17, which mediate further cellular infiltration and the characteristic edema associated with it.7)

We previously generated IL-19 deficient (IL-19 knock out (KO)) mice that demonstrate, in vivo, the importance of inflammatory bowel disease and, in vitro, the significance of macrophage function.810) IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24, and IL-26 belong to the same IL-10 family of interleukins. IL-19 is expressed in immune cells, such as granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-stimulated or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated and naive monocytes,11) activated and naive B cells,12) and non-immune cells such as epithelial cells and keratinocytes.13) IL-19 signaling is mediated by the IL-20 receptor, a heterodimer receptor composed of an IL-20 receptor α subunit (IL-20Rα) and an IL-20 receptor β subunit (IL-20Rβ).14) IL-20Rα and IL-20Rβ are expressed in non-immune cells such as keratinocytes. In contrast, only IL-20Rβ is expressed in immune cells including natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, B cells, and T cells.13) IL-19 is distinctly correlated with the progress of the T-helper 2 (Th2) phenotype, including the pathogenesis of asthma.15,16) IL-19 serum levels are increased in patients with asthma, corresponding to the levels of Th2 mediators, including IL-4 and IL-13.15) Moreover, IL-19 is related to the pathophysiology of psoriasis, a Th1-mediated epidermal disease.1719) The psoriatic epidermis has high IL-19 expression,19) and IL-19 released by keratinocytes upregulates the production of keratinocyte growth factor from CD8+ T cells, which form a positive feedback loop that exacerbates psoriasis.18) Thus, IL-19 regulates the development of psoriasis through the facilitation of the Th1 response. However, the involvement of IL-19 in ACD and the CHS response is not well understood. IL-19 is expressed in keratinocytes, macrophages, and B cells. In addition, IL-19 affects T cell function. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that IL-19 may mediate a crucial function in CHS. This is the first report that shows the striking finding of IL-19 in the activation of inflammatory responses and in the control of IL-17-mediated epidermal immune reactions in an in vivo CHS model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

We used IL-19KO mice on a BALB/c background.10) Heterozygous mice were crossed to produce IL-19KO and wild-type (WT) control mice. All mice used were 8–15 weeks old. All animal protocols were approved by the Osaka Prefecture University Animal Care and Committee.

Hapten-Induced Contact Hypersensitivity

Mice were sensitized by applying 25 µL of 0.5% 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) in vehicle solution (acetone : olive oil 3 : 1, v/v) to shaved abdominal skin. Five days after sensitization, the mice were challenged by painting 20 µL of 0.1% DNFB on their ears. Mice were sensitized by applying 150 µL of 0.5% fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I (FITC, Sigma-Aldrich) in vehicle solution (acetone : dibutyl phthalate 1 : 1, v/v) to shaved abdominal skin. Five days after sensitization, the mice were challenged by applying 20 µL of 0.5% FITC on their ears. Ear swelling was measured with a micrometer 24 and 48 h after the challenge. Ear swelling was evaluated as the thickness of the ear before and after the challenge.

Histological Analysis

Mouse ears were routinely stained with hematoxyline and eosin (HE) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mast cell infiltration in the ears was stained with toluidine blue.10)

Immunofluorescent Staining

Frozen sections of the ears were used. Immunofluorescent staining was performed as described previously20) with some modifications.21) We used a rat anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (AbD Serotec, Oxford, U.K., CI:A3-1) to detect macrophages and a rat anti-mouse Gr-1 antibody (AbD Serotec, RB6-8C5) to detect neutrophils. Dendritic cells were detected using a hamster anti-mouse CD11c Alexa Fluor488 antibody (AbD Serotec). CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were detected by Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse CD4 and Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse CD8a antibodies (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). The double-positive immunoreactivities of IL-19 (rabbit anti-IL-19 polyclonal antibody; Abcam plc, Cambridge, U.K.) were detected using confocal images collected using a laser-scanning microscope.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure IL-19 and IFNγ mRNA expression in the ears and lymph nodes and was performed as described previously.22) The primers for IL-19, IFNγ, and IL-17 were 5′-GCC ATG CAA ACT AAG GAC ACC-3′ and 5′-TTG GTC ATG CAG CAC ACA TC-3′, 5′-TAC ACA CTG CAT CTT GGC TTT G-3′ and 5′-CTT CCA CAT CTA TGC CAC TTG AG-3′, and 5′-GCT CCA GAA GGC CCT CAG A-3′ and 5′-AGC TTT CCC TCC GCA TTG A-3′, respectively. Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mRNA was used to normalize mRNA expression.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining of frozen sections of the ears was performed as described previously23) with some modifications.24) The immunoreactivity of IL-19 was detected using the 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) system.

Cell Isolation and Cytokine Production

Cells were isolated from the inguinal and axillary lymph nodes taken from mice sensitized with 0.5% DNFB on their shaved abdominal skin 5 d previously. The cells were cultured with or without 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid dehydrate (DNBS; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) (as the soluble form of DNFB) for 72 h. The concentration of the cytokines was determined by MAGPIX (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.).

Splenocytes were isolated from the spleen and were activated in T-cell activation plates as described previously.9) After 48 h, the concentration of IL-17 was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Flow Cytometry

Preparation of single-cell suspensions was performed as described previously.25) The ears were collected, cut into small pieces, and digested with 0.25 mg/mL Liberase™ (Roch Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim Germany) and 12.5 µg/mL deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 1 h. Cells from the ears were treated with 0.2 µg/mL Fc blocker (anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (2.4G2 clone); TONBO Biosciences, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) and reacted with an anti-mouse CD8a-FITC antibody (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, U.S.A.). Flow cytometry was performed using an S3e™ cell sorter (Bio-Rad).

Statistical Analyses

Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA for non-repeated measures to detect differences among the 4 groups. The differences between groups were determined using the Tukey–Kramer test. The statistical significance of the parametric data was evaluated using the two-tailed Student’s t-test to detect differences between 2 groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The DNFB-Induced CHS Response Was Increased in IL-19KO Mice

We quantified the phenotype of IL-19KO mice to the hapten-challenged CHS responses by measuring ear thickness. IL-19KO mice showed severe ear swelling compared with WT mice at 24 and 48 h after the DNFB challenge (Fig. 1A left panel). In contrast, ear swelling was almost the same between the knockout and WT mice after the FITC challenge (Fig. 1A right panel). Ear tissue from IL-19KO mice revealed infiltrated cells and edema 48 h after the DNFB challenge (Fig. 1B). Because IL-19KO mice showed severe ear swelling, we focus on the CHS responses by the DNFB challenge.

Fig. 1. Exacerbation of the DNFB-Induced CHS Response in IL-19KO Mice

(A) WT mice (n=10 for DNFB; n=3 for FITC) and IL-19KO mice (n=9 for DNFB; n=4 for FITC) were sensitized with DNFB (left) or FITC (right). A CHS response was elicited by DNFB (left) or FITC (right) on the ears five days later. Ear swelling was measured 24 and 48 h after the challenges. (B) HE staining in the ears of sensitized WT mice (n=3 for vehicle; n=10 for DNFB) and IL-19KO mice (n=3 for vehicle; n=9 for DNFB) 48 h after the DNFB challenge. Bars=100 µm. Infiltrated cells were counted using ImageJ. ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 compared with WT mice. #p<0.05 compared with the vehicle.

We checked for the infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, and dendritic cells in the ears. As shown in Fig. 2A, the ears of IL-19KO mice had a high population of Gr-1+ cells. However, the recruitment of macrophages (Fig. 2A), mast cells (Fig. 2B), and dendritic cells (data not shown) in the ears of IL-19KO mice (evaluated using an anti-F4/80 antibody, toluidine blue staining, and an anti-CD11c antibody) were at the same level as those in the ears of WT mice. These findings show that IL-19 deficiency exacerbated the DNFB challenge-induced CHS response in mice.

Fig. 2. Identification of Increased Infiltrated Cells in the Ears of IL-19KO Mice

Immunohistochemical (A) and toluidine blue (B) staining in the ears of sensitized WT and IL-19KO mice 48 h after the DNFB challenge. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. (A) Sections of mouse ear were stained for Gr-1 or F4/80. Bars=50 µm (A) and 100 µm (B). Positive cells were counted using ImageJ. * p<0.05 compared with WT mice.

IL-19 Expression Is Increased in the Ear

As shown in Fig. 3A, the DNFB challenge in WT mice induced IL-19 mRNA expression in the ear. To confirm the results of the mRNA analysis, we conducted immunohistochemistry on the ear tissue for IL-19 expression. As shown in Fig. 3B, the expression of IL-19 was absent in the ears of WT mice that were not challenged with DNFB. There was a marked increase in the level of IL-19 in the border between the epidermis and dermis, as well as in the dermis of the ear, after the DNFB challenge. To identify which types of cells produce IL-19, we stained the tissues with F4/80, Gr-1 CD11c, CD4, and CD8a fluorescent immune cell marker antibodies. As shown in Fig. 3C, IL-19 was fully co-localized with F4/80 and partially co-localized with Gr-1. IL-19 was not co-localized with CD11c, CD4, or CD8a (data not shown).

Fig. 3. Expression of IL-19 mRNA and Identification of Cell Types That Produced IL-19

(A) The expression level of IL-19 was examined by qPCR in the ears of WT mice 48 h after the DNFB challenge. The IL-19 mRNA level in DNFB (n=6) is shown as a fold increase relative to the level in the vehicle-treated mice (n=6). ** p<0.01 compared with the vehicle. (B, C) Immunohistochemical staining in the ears of sensitized WT mice and IL-19KO mice 48 h after the DNFB challenge. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. Ear sections were stained for IL-19 (B) with Gr-1 or F4/80 (C). Bars=100 µm (B) and 50 µm (C).

Hapten-Specific T Cell Priming in IL-19KO Mice Is Comparable to That in WT Mice

To address the mechanistic details underlying the IL-19-mediated DNFB challenge-induced CHS responses in mice, we examined the response of antigen-specific T cells. We used regional lymph nodes harvested 5 d after DNFB sensitization and evaluated the response of T cells to DNBS, a water-soluble reagent having the same antigenicity as DNFB. As shown in Fig. 4, compared with WT mice and in response to DNBS, T cells from IL-19KO mice induced markedly high production of IL-17 and IL-6, but not IFNγ and IL-4.

Fig. 4. Increased Responses of Antigen-Specific T Cells in IL-19KO Mice

The cells prepared from axillary and inguinal lymph nodes in WT mice (n=7) and IL-19KO mice (n=9) 5 d after DNFB sensitization were stimulated with DNBS (50 µg/mL) for 72 h. The cytokine concentration was measured by MAGPIX. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 compared with WT mice.

IFNγ and IL-17 Expression in the Ear

IFNγ and an accumulation of Th1/Tc1 cells were observed at the ear in this DNFB-induced CHS response. In addition to confirming increased IFNγ expression, we examined whether IL-17 expression was increased in the ear. As shown in Fig. 5, the DNFB challenge in WT mice showed expression of IFNγ and IL-17 mRNA in the ear. IFNγ expression, but not IL-17 expression, was significantly increased in DNFB-challenged WT mice. These results suggest that IFNγ is a key cytokine and that IL-17 is not a key cytokine but does exacerbate inflammation in this CHS response model.

Fig. 5. Expression of IFNγ and IL-17 mRNA in the Ear

The expression levels of IFNγ and IL-17 in the ears of WT mice 48 h after the DNFB challenge were measured using qPCR. The IFNγ and IL-17 mRNA levels in the DNFB challenged mice (n=3−4) are shown as a fold increase relative to the level in the vehicle-treated mice (n=3−4). * p<0.05 compared with the vehicle-treated mice.

IL-19 Function Is Linked to the IL-17-Mediated, but Not the IFNγ-Mediated Pathway

To investigate the hypothesis that the increased CHS response in IL-19KO mice was correlated with the enhancement of a hypersensitivity, we examined the levels of IL-17 in T cells and found that splenic T cells from IL-19KO mice produced increased amounts of IL-17 (Fig. 6).

The CHS response to a DNFB challenge is mediated by the Th1 cytokine IFNγ. Tc1 cells, as well as Th1 cells, secrete IFNγ. We already showed that, in response to DNBS treatment, T cells from IL-19KO mice produced the same levels of IFNγ as T cells from WT mice (Fig. 4 lower left panel). To further refute the hypothesis that the increased CHS response in IL-19KO mice is correlated with increased IFNγ, we confirmed IFNγ levels in the tissues using qPCR and flow cytometry analysis. These procedures showed the same IFNγ mRNA levels in the ear and lymph nodes, and the same population of CD8+ T cells in the ears of WT mice as that of IL-19KO mice with a CHS response to a DNFB challenge (Fig. 7). Our findings indicate that IL-19 can regulate the IL-17-mediated response.

Fig. 6. Increased IL-17 Production in T Cells from IL-19KO Mice

The cells, isolated from the spleens of WT mice (n=3) and IL-19KO mice (n=5) were cultured in T-cell activation plates for 48 h. The concentration of IL-17 was measured using an ELISA. ** p<0.01 compared with WT mice.

Fig. 7. Involvement of IFNγ on the Exacerbated CHS Response in IL-19KO Mice

(A) IFNγ mRNA expression in the ears and lymph nodes of DNFB-sensitized WT mice (n=10) and IL-19KO mice (n=9) 48 h after the DNFB challenge. The expression level of IFNγ was measured by qPCR. (B) Infiltrated CD8+ T cells in ear tissue from WT mice (n=4) and IL-19KO mice (n=3) 48 h after the DNFB challenge. The number of infiltrated CD8+ T cells was measured by flow cytometry.

Increased Inflammatory Responses in IL-19KO Mice

We next examined whether IL-19 expression changed during the sensitization phase. As shown in Fig. 8, the sensitization with DNFB in WT mice showed no further induction of IL-19 mRNA in the lymph nodes. IL-19 expression was present in the lymph nodes of WT mice without DNFB sensitization. In contrast, IL-19 expression was absent in the ears of WT mice without DNFB sensitization (Fig. 3A). To investigate the role of IL-19 deficiency in the sensitization phase, we cultured cells from the lymph nodes of IL-19KO mice sensitized with DNFB. As shown in Fig. 9, cells derived from the lymph nodes of IL-19KO mice released increased levels of IL-1β, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (not statistically significant), GM-CSF, C-C motif chemokine 5 (CCL5), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), and MIP-1β. Thus, IL-19KO mice showed enhanced inflammatory responses at the sensitization phase.

Fig. 8. IL-19 mRNA Expression in the Lymph Nodes

IL-19 mRNA expression in the lymph nodes of WT mice was measured by qPCR 5 d after DNFB sensitization. The IL-19 mRNA level in DNFB-sensitized mice (n=5) is shown as a fold increase relative to the mRNA level in vehicle-treated mice (n=5).

Fig. 9. Increased Cytokine Productions in Lymph Node Cells from IL-19KO Mice

The cells isolated from the axillary and inguinal lymph nodes of WT mice (n=7) and IL-19KO mice (n=9) 5 d after DNFB sensitization and were cultured for 72 h. Cytokine concentration was measured by MAGPIX. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 compared with WT mice.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to show that IL-19 regulates the DNFB-induced CHS response. We showed that IL-19 deficiency exacerbated the CHS response to a DNFB challenge, whereas there was no marked difference in the CHS response to a FITC challenge. One of the most striking findings presented here is the strong inflammatory phenotype in DNFB-challenged IL-19KO mice and the complete absence of this phenomenon in FITC-mediated CHS. The functional explanation for the differential inflammatory CHS to a FITC versus a DNFB challenge is that the response to a DNFB challenge is mediated by Th1 IFNγ-inducing haptens,26) whereas the response to a FITC challenge is mediated by a Th2 response.27) IL-19 is correlated to the progress of Th2-type diseases such as asthma.15,16) We believe that immune cells and signaling within the immunological network are different depending on the type of diseases; this includes CHS responses and asthma. These results suggest that IL-19 does not contribute to FITC-mediated Th2 responses in skin inflammation, unlike respiratory inflammation.

Our results also show that IL-19 signaling predicts a crucial function in a development of hapten-specific host reactions in the epidermis by regulating IL-17-producing cells such as Th17 cells. IL-17 released at regions of hapten exposure has been shown to play a stimulatory role in the sensitization phase28) and the effector part.29) IL-17 is expressed by γδT cells, as well as Th17 cells, in the skin. Jiang et al. reported that γδT cells play an important role in the CHS response by producing IL-17, which promotes neutrophil infiltration.30) It is likely, therefore, that IL-19 suppresses the activation of IL-17-producing cells including Th17 cells or γδT cells. Another possibility is that IL-19 may suppress the differentiation of naïve T cells to Th17 cells or γδT cells. Nonetheless, the immunological collaboration that seems to occur between IL-19 and IL-17 is an important interaction in inflammation of the skin. IL-19 affects the production of IL-17. Namely, IL-19 inhibits the production of IL-17A and promoted a Staphylococcus aureus-induced skin infection,31) which supports our data. We also showed that IL-17 production increased in IL-19KO mice with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis. In particular, lymph node cells in IL-19KO mice with TNBS-induced colitis have increased levels of IL-17.9) Mice with TNBS-mediated colitis have a marked Th1 response.32) In other models of colitis, cells derived from the lymph nodes of IL-19KO mice with oxazolone-induced colitis released the same levels of IL-17 upon activation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies compared with WT mice (unpublished data). Mice with oxazolone-mediated colitis are important for the research of a Th2 phenotype.33,34) These data show that IL-17-mediated responses are enhanced in the absence of IL-19 signaling. We showed that the number of Gr-1-positive cells in the ears of IL-19KO mice increased. How does IL-19 affect Gr-1-positive cells? Many kinds of chemokines with a CHS response were altered in the lymph nodes and skin. Therefore, it seems that one or more chemokines for Gr-1-positive cells, such as CXCL1, were increased by an IL-19 deficiency. One possible explanation is that increased IL-17 through IL-19 deficiency enhanced the infiltration of Gr-1-positive cells in the ear because IL-17 produces some chemokines and elicits skin inflammation.

Interestingly, there is a possible relationship between IL-17 and the FITC-induced CHS response. Cowden JM et al. previously reported that a reduced CHS response induced by FITC was accompanied by decreased IL-17 levels.35) Therefore, the interactions among IL-19, IL-17, and the Th2 response may be an interesting topic of future research.

We showed that IL-19KO mice failed to increase IFNγ production in the ears, lymph nodes, and T cells in the lymph nodes and to alter the population of CD8+ T cells, which are the main sources of INFγ in Th1-type CHS response in the ear.7) NK cells and NKT cells, as sources of INF-γ, contribute to the CHS response.36) To date, no studies have investigated the possible involvement and effect of IL-19 signaling on NK cells and NKT cells. Further study is needed to determine the role of IL-19 in NK cells and NKT cells. It is unlikely that IL-19 is related to the Th1 response in skin inflammation.

The population of CD4+ T cells includes not only Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells contributing to inflammation but also regulatory T cells, which suppress the immune response using cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β. Our data show similar levels of IL-10 and TGF-β mRNA in the lymph nodes of IL-19KO mice with a DNFB challenge-induced CHS response compared with WT mice (data not shown). This shows that IL-19 is directly involved in IL-17-producing cells.

We found that IL-19 is not expressed in the ears of WT mice with or without DNFB sensitization. A DNFB challenge is needed to induce IL-19 expression in the ear. In contrast, IL-19 is expressed in the lymph nodes of WT mice without DNFB sensitization. This is the reason that many types of inflammatory cytokines were increased in the cells derived from the lymph nodes of IL-19KO mice in the sensitization phase. In skin inflammation, several types of cells are candidates as the source of IL-19 production. Our data indicate that F4/80-positive cells fully produced IL-19 and Gr-1-positive cells only partially produced IL-19 during the elicitation part of the CHS response. As far as we know, there is no report that neutrophils produce IL-19. Therefore, it is likely that F4/80-positive and Gr-1-positive macrophages produce IL-19 in the ear during the CHS response. Our results showed that IL-19 has dual functions in the CHS response, regulating IL-17-producing cells and controlling inflammatory cytokines. Whereas some roles affect the development of the CHS response, other roles may be more evident in several stage of the CHS response.

In this study, we addressed the function of IL-19 in skin inflammation. In conclusion, these results indicate that IL-19 influenced IL-17-producing cells under the Th1-mediated immune response and that there is a general, increased tendency of immune cells to produce cytokines and chemokines. Collectively, our results clarify the regulatory mechanisms of IL-19 in vivo. IL-19 is a new mediator with anti-inflammatory effects.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 25292174 (Y.T.A.).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
 
© 2018 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
feedback
Top