Interference of New Antiseizure Agents with Hospital Transfer of Stroke Patients in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Patients in Japan often have difficulty in screening and selecting chronic-care and rehabilitation hospitals for transfer because of the high cost and unavailability of new antiseizure medications, such as perampanel and lacosamide. To investigate whether the requirement for perampanel and lacosamide interfered with patients’ hospital transfer by comparing the number of days required for hospital transfer. Data were obtained from patients 1) who were diagnosed with intracerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, 2) who were treated with antiseizure medications for epilepsy, and 3) who were transferred to another hospital. The main outcome measures were the length of hospital stay and days from the last seizure to hospital transfer.Ninety-four eligible patients were divided into those treated with perampanel or lacosamide (n = 18) and those treated with other agents (n = 76). The mean length of hospital stay and days from the last seizure to hospital transfer were 52.9 and 45.4 d in the perampanel and lacosamide group, and 32.7 and 28.6 d in the other medication group (p < 0.001). The mean antiseizure medication costs and total drug costs were U.S. &#36;4.88 and &#36;6.85 in the perampanel/lacosamide group and U.S. &#36;1.94 and &#36;4.41 in the other medication group (p < 0.001, p = 0.007), respectively. Considering antiseizure medication availability and cost in the transfer destination hospital is important when choosing medications for patients requiring hospital transfer from an acute-care hospital.