Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Ischemic Heart Disease
Soluble Receptor of Advanced Glycated Endproducts Is Associated With Plaque Vulnerability in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hun-Jun ParkJu-Yeol BaekWoo Seung ShinDong-Bin KimSung Won JangDong Il ShinYoon Seok KohSuk Min SeoJae-Sun UhmTae Hoon KimChan Joon KimPum Joon KimKiyuk ChangWook Sung ChungKi-Bae SeungJong Min Lee
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2011 年 75 巻 7 号 p. 1685-1690

詳細
抄録

Background: The roles of soluble and endogenous secretory receptors for advanced glycation endproducts (sRAGE and esRAGE, respectively) in plaque vulnerability are unknown in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and Results: We enrolled 54 patients with AMI (27 patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus [DM]) who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and 54 controls who were matched for age, gender and the presence of DM. Plasma levels of s/esRAGE and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 were measured at the time of coronary angiography. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the AMI and control groups, except for the C-reactive protein levels (CRP: 14.1±14.2mg/L vs. 3.7±5.2mg/L, P<0.001). The plasma levels of MMP-9 (28.6±21.4 vs. 14.3±8.5ng/ml P<0.001) and sRAGE (0.61±0.28 vs. 0.41±0.17ng/ml, P<0.001) were higher in the AMI group than in the controls. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the plasma levels of MMP-9 and sRAGE above the median (odds ratio [OR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.58; P=0.044; OR, 2.47; 95%CI, 1.05-5.80; P=0.039, respectively) were independent predictors of AMI, as well as being a current smoker (OR, 2.98; 95%CI, 1.18-7.55; P=0.021) and CRP≥3.0mg/L (OR, 3.08; 95%CI, 1.25-7.59; P=0.015). Conclusions: An elevated plasma level of sRAGE might be independently associated with plaque vulnerability, as well as MMP-9, in patients with AMI. (Circ J 2011; 75: 1685-1690)

著者関連情報
© 2011 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top