Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Imaging
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Performs Better in the Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis Compared to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography
Kiwamu KamiyaMamoru SakakibaraNaoya AsakawaShiro YamadaTakashi YoshitaniHiroyuki IwanoHiroshi KomatsuMasanao NayaSatoru ChibaSatoshi YamadaOsamu ManabeYasuka KikuchiNoriko Oyama-ManabeKoji ObaHiroyuki Tsutsui
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML
電子付録

2014 年 78 巻 10 号 p. 2468-2476

詳細
抄録
Background:Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured on catheterization is now widely used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR, however, is invasive and carries potential procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability in functionally significant stenosis identified on FFR, between cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI), single-photon emission computed tomography MPI (SPECT-MPI), and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with CAD.Methods and Results:A total of 25 patients who had at least 1 angiographic stenosis ≥50% on coronary angiography was studied. CMR-MPI, SPECT-MPI and DSE were done before FFR measurement. FFR was measured in all 3 major epicardial coronary arteries. Out of 71 vascular territories excluding 4 territories due to inadequate imaging, 29 (41%) had FFR <0.80. The sensitivity of CMR-MPI was significantly higher than that of SPECT-MPI and DSE (P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CMR-MPI (AUC, 0.92) was significantly greater than for SPECT-MPI (AUC, 0.73; P=0.006) and DSE (AUC, 0.69; P<0.001).Conclusions:CMR-MPI performed well in the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined according to FFR, and had the highest diagnostic sensitivity among the 3 modalities tested in patients with CAD. (Circ J 2014; 78: 2468–2476)
著者関連情報
© 2014 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top