Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Reviews
Adjunctive Testing in the Evaluation of Adults After Kawasaki Disease
Lori B. DanielsJane C. Burns
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2015 年 79 巻 11 号 p. 2299-2305

詳細
Abstract

Acute Kawasaki disease (KD) is diagnosed and treated by pediatricians, but decades later, these individuals are presenting to adult cardiologists with a variety of cardiovascular sequelae, including myocardial ischemia and infarction, congestive heart failure secondary to myocardial fibrosis, and claudication because of vascular insufficiency from thrombosed peripheral arteries. There are no clinical trials to guide management, interventions, and medical therapy in this patient population. This review summarizes the emerging information regarding evaluation of the cardiovascular status of adults decades after childhood KD. (Circ J 2015; 79: 2299–2305)

Kawasaki Disease (KD) is a self-limited, acute vasculitis of unknown etiology that occurs predominantly in infants and young children under 5 years of age. It is a leading cause of childhood-acquired heart disease worldwide. Approximately 25% of untreated children develop coronary artery aneurysms, which can lead to myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, or sudden death.1,2 Beyond coronary artery aneurysms, there are conflicting data as to the degree of damage to the vasculature in KD patients, and the long-term ramifications of this, if any, with regards to future cardiovascular disease. Two additional areas of controversy regarding the prognosis of patients late after KD have also emerged. The first is whether patients, especially those with apparently normal coronary arteries or with transiently dilated coronary arteries, will have long-term cardiovascular sequelae. A second question is whether individuals after KD will develop accelerated atherosclerotic changes in the coronary arteries as a direct consequence of the inflammation in their arterial walls during the acute illness.3 There is ongoing debate about which KD patients need to be monitored long-term after KD, and which tests are indicated.4,5

To evaluate patients late after KD for evidence of dysfunction or structural changes in the coronary arteries and other vascular beds, a number of noninvasive tests have been studied. These include tests to assess endothelial cell function, carotid artery thickness and strain, and aortic and/or peripheral artery stiffness, as well as advanced imaging approaches involving either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this article is to review the literature regarding adjunctive testing in the evaluation of adults with a history of KD.

Noninvasive Assessment of Peripheral Arteries

Endothelial Cell Function

Endothelial cell dysfunction is a well-established marker of vascular risk that is strongly associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors6 and is an independent predictor of incident cardiovascular events in healthy, low-risk populations.79 Endothelial dysfunction may be evident as early as adolescence in high-risk populations.10 Factors that can improve endothelial cell function include dietary,11,12 lifestyle,11 and pharmacologic interventions.13

In the setting of coronary artery disease or peripheral atherosclerosis, impaired endothelial cell function is associated with an increased risk of incident cardiovascular events.14,15 However, the vasculopathy of KD is distinct from that of typical atherosclerosis.4 There is no compelling reason to believe a priori that the associations between endothelial cell dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, which are established for typical atherosclerosis, are also true of the vasculopathy seen after KD.

The gold standard for noninvasively assessing endothelial cell function is via ultrasound measurement of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in response to reactive hyperemia in the brachial artery.16 However, this technique is very labor intensive, highly operator dependent, and requires expensive specialized equipment, making it impractical for routine use in clinical studies or clinical care.17,18 To overcome these technical obstacles, several alternate methods of assessing endothelial cell function have been developed. One of these, the Endo-PAT (Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) assesses endothelial vasomotor function after reactive hyperemia by pulse amplitude tonometry (RH-PAT), as measured in the fingertips (Figure 1).17 As with FMD, a lower PAT value correlates with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in both adults7 and children,19 though FMD and PAT may be measuring distinct aspects of endothelial function.20

Figure 1.

Endo-pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) quantifies the endothelium-mediated changes in vascular tone, elicited by a 5-min occlusion of the brachial artery (using a standard blood pressure cuff). When the cuff is released, the surge of blood flow causes an endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD). The dilation, manifested as reactive hyperemia (RH), is captured by Endo-PAT as an increase in the PAT signal amplitude. A post-occlusion to pre-occlusion ratio is calculated to provide the RH index (RHI, or RH-PAT). (Printed with permission of Itamar Medical, Israel.)

Endothelial cell dysfunction has been documented late after KD in both coronary and systemic arteries after regression of aneurysms.21,22 Currently, there is some debate about whether endothelial dysfunction is pervasive in the KD population, as prior studies have yielded discrepant findings. A recent meta-analysis analyzed 18 studies of endothelial cell function in patients at various timepoints years after KD, and found extensive heterogeneity in the results.23 In general, most studies found poorer endothelial cell function in KD patients with coronary artery aneurysms compared with controls; however, results for subjects without aneurysms were more variable. None of the studies specifically analyzed the subgroup of patients with transiently dilated coronary arteries, and the implications for management and outcomes are unknown.

Vascular Stiffness

Arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in various populations.2429 Decreased arterial elasticity can be detected in childhood in those with cardiovascular risk factors.30,31 Arterial stiffness can be assessed noninvasively using pulse wave velocity (PWV) or the β stiffness index (SI) of the carotid artery.32 PWV measurement involves measuring the timing and magnitude of the reflected pressure wave that results when a pulse of blood encounters impedance as it moves through the arterial tree (Figure 2). Higher arterial stiffness results in an earlier reflected wave. Measurement of arterial PWV via simultaneous Doppler flow signals obtained from the carotid and femoral arteries is considered the gold standard, but brachial-ankle PWV is a technically easier alternative method.33 In adults with atherosclerotic disease, and in the general population, an increased arterial PWV is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events.28,34,35

Figure 2.

Measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). PWV is calculated as ∆ L(meters)/∆t. Stiffer arteries will have higher PWV. (Reproduced with permission from Schillaci G, et al.81)

Another way to assess vascular stiffness is via analysis of the carotid artery SI. The SI can be measured noninvasively using ultrasound and calculated based on the relation between systemic blood pressure and pulsatile changes in the arterial diameter.36 In small studies of selected cohorts, carotid SI is associated with adverse cardiovascular risk factors in children and with severity of coronary artery disease in adults after myocardial infarction,36,37 though there are limited data regarding SI and future cardiovascular risk.

In the subacute phase of KD, young children have evidence of stiffer carotid arteries than healthy controls.38 Beyond this timeframe, several studies have found evidence of increased carotid stiffness in KD patients with coronary artery aneurysms.23,39 However, whether carotid stiffness is also increased in KD patients without aneurysms remains controversial.40,41 In a meta-analysis that included 10 studies of carotid artery stiffness, the majority of studies found that KD patients had stiffer carotids than controls.23 However, this was primarily true in the studies that included large numbers of patients with coronary aneurysms. In contrast, 5 of 6 studies that included only patients without aneurysms did not show any difference in carotid stiffness.

Studies evaluating peripheral arterial stiffness in KD patients using PWV have more consistent results; 6 such studies showed stiffer vessels after KD regardless of the presence of coronary aneurysms,23,39,4244 but half of the studies were conducted by the same group, and 1 found significantly stiffer arteries in men after KD, but not women.45 None of the studies separately evaluated patients with transiently dilated coronary arteries.

Carotid Artery Intima Media Thickness (IMT)

Measurement of the carotid IMT has been used and validated over the past few decades as a noninvasive surrogate measure of cardiovascular risk.4649 Carotid IMT is associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, as well as with atherosclerosis in other vascular beds (including the coronary arteries),50 and with future vascular events.51 It is assessed by measuring the distance between the intima and media of the carotid artery wall, as imaged by B-mode ultrasound. There are a variety of protocols used to measure carotid IMT, but the most common involves averaging the thickness of the far wall of both the right and the left common carotid arteries.52 Several studies have established reference ranges for normal carotid IMT measurements in children and young adults.5355

Assessment of studies of carotid IMT after KD is complicated by significant study heterogeneity, including differences in subjects’ age, the time since acute KD, ethnicity, size of the study, and methodology. Specifically, carotid IMT may be increased early after the profound inflammation of acute KD, but is likely in many patients to subside with time, making the elapsed time since the acute illness a particularly relevant factor. With these caveats in mind, studies are split as to whether carotid IMT is increased in subjects overall after KD, compared with controls. Some studies comparing KD patients with coronary artery aneurysms found that this subset had increased carotid IMT compared with controls.40,43,5658 Included in this group is the largest study of 203 subjects (plus 50 controls), in whom a difference in carotid IMT was seen primarily among those patients with giant aneurysms.59 The clinical significance of an increased carotid IMT after KD is unknown, as there are no longitudinal studies assessing any relationship between this and future cardiovascular events.

Summary

All these attempts to translate vascular assessments that have been validated for atherosclerotic heart disease for use in KD may share a flawed basic assumption. It is well documented that atherosclerosis is a diffuse inflammatory lesion that affects endothelial cell function and vessel architecture in a global manner. Although it is true that clinical complications may relate to specific vascular beds (eg, the coronary arteries or arteries supplying the lower limbs), the pathologic process is diffuse and affects all vascular beds to a greater or lesser degree. However, autopsy studies suggest that the same is not true for KD. Examination of different arteries decades after KD suggests that the major pathology is concentrated in the region of the aneurysms or remodeled aneurysms that occur predominantly in the coronary arteries and much less frequently in the brachial and iliofemoral arteries. Thus, the vascular insult and subsequent pathologic changes are really concentrated in a few vascular beds and the long-term sequelae are not diffuse. It follows that interrogation of the brachial artery, for example, may not be instructive regarding the structure and function of the coronary arteries late after KD. Therefore, caution must be exercised in interpreting the results of studies that have only been validated in patients with atherosclerosis.

Advanced Imaging for Detection of Late Complications

Coronary Artery Calcium Score

Calcium scoring by multi-slice CT is used to risk stratify patients with atherosclerotic heart disease and is a powerful predictor of mortality.60 Using electron beam CT calcium scoring to study 79 Japanese patients 2 months to 20 years after KD onset, a positive calcium score was detected only in those individuals with coronary artery aneurysms at least 6 mm in diameter.61 In a study of a mixed ethnic population of 70 individuals with a median interval of 15 years between KD onset and multi-slice CT calcium scoring, 11 (16%) had a positive score.62 All had coronary artery abnormalities documented during the acute phase of their KD and no individual with normal echocardiograms had detectable calcium. The sensitivity of calcium scoring for detection of coronary artery aneurysms or dilation was 100% when the scoring was performed at least 10 years after disease onset. This suggests that CT calcium scoring is a low-radiation, low-cost method for screening young adults with a history of KD whose initial echocardiographic results may not be known. At our center, all adolescent and young adult KD patients are screened using a CT calcium score before being released from further surveillance to ensure that no coronary arterial lesions are missed.

CT Angiography (CTA)

Adults who developed coronary artery aneurysms during the acute phase of KD require life-long monitoring for late complications, including myocardial ischemia caused by stenosis or thrombosis in the damaged arterial segments and myocardial fibrosis. The goals of imaging are three-fold: (1) to assess structural changes in the coronary arteries associated with luminal myofibroblastic proliferation, thrombosis, and calcification, (2) to assess the possibility of ongoing arterial wall inflammation, and (3) to assess ventricular function, wall motion abnormalities secondary to inducible ischemia, and myocardial fibrosis. Because these imaging procedures are being performed in young individuals who will require life-long monitoring, obtaining the best data with the least radiation exposure should be a guiding principle.

CTA has now virtually replaced diagnostic invasive angiography as the preferred modality for imaging the coronary arteries in adolescents and adults after KD. With advances in the technology and ECG-triggered prospective gating, image capture is of higher quality and with lower radiation doses (<1 mSv) than in the past.63 Heart rate control continues to be important for optimal images during CTA and the use of β-blockade to both reduce and steady the heart rate yields the best quality scans. CTA is the preferred modality for assessment of morphologic changes in aneurysms and progressive calcification at most centers (Figure 3). CTA is also being investigated as a way to generate patient-specific computer-simulated models of coronary artery aneurysms after KD, to assess the risk of thrombosis (Figure 4).64 However, invasive angiography is still the preferred modality for patients in whom an interventional procedure is contemplated or assessment of fractional flow reserve is needed to evaluate for possible surgical bypass grafting. If invasive angiography is performed, intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography may aid in the assessment of thrombus burden and in determining the true diameter of the lumen for sizing of stents.65,66

Figure 3.

Serial CT angiograms showing progressive calcification in giant left and right coronary artery aneurysms at 7, 8, and 10 years after Kawasaki disease. Reproduced with permission from Kahn AM, et al.62

Figure 4.

Patient-specific computer simulation of coronary artery aneurysms following Kawasaki disease showing low (blue) wall shear stress conferring a risk of thrombosis. Hemodynamics were modeled in the aneurysms using anatomic data obtained by multidetector computed tomography. Adapted with permission from Sengupta D, et al.64

Assessment of persistent arterial wall inflammation has become a topic of concern based on data from positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) combined with CT imaging, suggesting that in some individuals vascular wall inflammation may persist despite resolution of systemic signs of inflammation.67,68 Although PET/CT remain a research tool, because of the high radiation exposure (>10 mSv), newer techniques combining PET with FDG and MRI that reduce the radiation exposure by 50% are being reported.69 Delayed-enhancement with contrast-enhanced MRI has been used to detect vascular wall inflammation in giant cell arteritis and Takayasu’s arteritis and these techniques may have application in KD.70,71 The search continues for better biomarkers or imaging procedures that can identify individuals with persistent inflammation who may benefit from adjunctive therapies.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CMRA)

CMRA has the advantage of no radiation exposure and the ability to assess ventricular volumes and cardiac function in addition to imaging the coronary arteries. However, at this juncture in the development of CMRA, many centers prefer CTA because of the rapid acquisition of images and shorter time in the scanner. Expertise in imaging the coronary arteries by CMRA remains highly variable among centers at this time.

Noninvasive evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in adults late after KD in childhood remains a challenge. Autopsy data and examination of explanted hearts following cardiac transplantation in individuals with a history of KD demonstrate the development of extensive myocardial fibrosis secondary either to microvascular ischemia or diffuse post-inflammatory changes (Figure 5).4,72 Although MRI with late gadolinium enhancement is effective in identifying regional wall abnormalities, detection of diffuse fibrosis has been more problematic, though recent studies offer promise. In studies of adults with either systemic sclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis, myocardial T1 mapping with extracellular volume quantification was effective in detecting persistent myocardial inflammation as well as diffuse fibrosis, and similar studies in KD are in progress.73,74

Figure 5.

Bridging myocardial fibrosis in the left ventricle of the explanted heart of a 29-year-old man who had 4–6 mm aneurysms in the left and right coronary arteries documented by echocardiography during acute Kawasaki disease at age 3 years (trichrome stain) (400× magnification).

Biomarkers for Detection of Late CV Fibrosis

Biomarkers for persistent vascular inflammation and myocardial fibrosis late after KD are actively being sought. One candidate is galectin-3 (Gal-3), a multifunctional protein in the extracellular matrix that has been associated with heart failure and myocardial fibrosis. In a study of 81 adult subjects with a history of KD, plasma levels of Gal-3 were elevated only in the 6 subjects with giant coronary artery aneurysms.75 Immunohistochemical staining of myocardium from autopsies and an explanted heart, decades after acute KD, revealed diffuse myocardial fibrosis, as well as abundant staining of spindle-shaped cells with a myofibroblast phenotype. The naturally occurring tetra-peptide, N-acetyl-ser-asp-lys-pro (AcSDKP), has been shown in animal studies to reduce myocardial inflammation, prevent fibrosis mediated by Gal-3,76,77 and to inhibit epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cultured cells.78 Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have also been demonstrated to modulate Gal-3 expression after acute myocardial infarction and to reduce fibrosis mediated through the TGFβ-SMAD3 signaling pathway.79 Genetic variation in this pathway influences both KD susceptibility and aneurysm formation.80 In the future, inhibition of Gal-3 with consequent reduction of TGF-β signaling may be a strategy to reduce myocardial fibrosis in KD patients with severe coronary artery involvement and elevated serum levels of Gal-3.

Conclusions

Adjunctive, noninvasive testing has the potential to improve our understanding of the vascular complications that may occur late after KD. Studies of noninvasive measures of vascular health have had mixed results to date, but a recurring theme is that persistence of coronary artery aneurysms is associated with abnormal results in other vascular beds, including peripheral endothelial cell function, vascular stiffness, and the carotid IMT. No studies have specifically addressed the question of whether the subset of patients with transiently dilated coronary arteries is also at increased risk. Measures of cardiac fibrosis, whether via MRI or biomarkers, is also promising for risk stratification but still in the early stages of development. In contrast to the unknown clinical role of measures of vascular function and fibrosis, advanced imaging techniques have the potential to immediately aid in risk stratification of individuals in whom the coronary artery history is unknown (CT coronary calcium scoring), or in whom there are known aneurysms that need more advanced assessment (CTA). Large, multicenter, long-term studies of patients after KD are needed to reach definitive conclusions regarding the optimal follow-up modalities, intensity, and duration for the majority of patients with KD.

Disclosures

None.

Financial Support

This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the Macklin Foundation (JCB and LBD), and from the American Heart Association, National Affiliate (LBD).

References
 
© 2015 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top