論文ID: CJ-15-0399
To the Editor:
In the February 2015 issue of the Circulation Journal, Silvain et al1 review the available laboratory tests to evaluate the anticoagulant effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). To assess the anticoagulant activity of apixaban, they show that prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are inadequate and should not be recommended. The test that should be used is a modified anti-Xa using specific calibrators and controls.1 These recommendations are according to most of the published data on apixaban laboratory evaluation tests.2 However, in the figure published in their article, thrombin-clotting time (TT) is presented as a third choice for apixaban.1
In studies performed in order to determine which coagulation assay could be used to assess the effect of apixaban on hemostasis, TT was evaluated by a chronometric method, using reagents from Diagnostica Stago and it was shown that TT is not influenced by apixaban.2 Indeed, direct or indirect factor Xa inhibitors have no effect on TT and cannot be recommended for monitoring NOACs anticoagulant activity, as referred by others.3,4
NOACs were designed to be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. However, in some circumstances, namely when patients need emergency surgery or present with severe bleedings, it is important to have laboratory tests that are able to assess their anticoagulant activity.
Routine coagulation tests, such as aPTT, TT or PT, are normally used to evaluate the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran or rivaroxaban. These tests are easily performed and available 24 h per day. Because of its expanding use worldwide, it is important to have laboratory tests that are able to assess the anticoagulant activity of apixaban whenever needed, without limitations of time and equipment, as the specific anti-Xa test is not available 24 h per day in most hospitals.
None.
(Released online May 29, 2015)