Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Efficacy of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Monitoring in Evaluating Response to Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty
Kentaro JujoKatsumi SaitoIssei IshidaYuho FurukiTaisuke OuchiAhsung KimYuki SuzukiHaruki SekiguchiJunichi YamaguchiHiroshi OgawaNobuhisa Hagiwara
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML 早期公開
電子付録

論文ID: CJ-16-0347

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background: Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) improves patency in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), but improvement in clinic blood pressure (BP) is seen in only 20–40% of patients who undergo PTRA. This study investigated the effects of PTRA on BP lowering, assessed on 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and identified preoperative features predictive of satisfactory BP improvement after PTRA.

Methods and Results: Of 1,753 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography, 31 patients with angiographically significant ARAS and translesional pressure gradient (TLPG) >20 mmHg underwent PTRA. ABPM was performed before, at 1 month and at 1 year after PTRA; patients with average systolic ABPM-BP decrease >10 mmHg at 1 month from baseline were categorized as responders. There was no obvious relationship between clinic BP and ABPM-BP at baseline. ABPM-BP was significantly higher in responders at baseline (SBP: 148 vs. 126 mmHg, P<0.01) and was improved 1 month after PTRA. This difference persisted until 1 year after PTRA. Night-time BP improved more than daytime BP in responders. Patients with higher baseline ABPM-BP achieved a larger decrease in ABPM-BP, but the severity of stenosis reflected by TLPG; renal duplex findings; and neurohumoral parameters other than baseline renal function, did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: Clinic BP does not represent daily hemodynamic status, whereas high ABPM-BP is a potent predictor of satisfactory BP response to PTRA.

著者関連情報
© 2016 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top