Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Risk Profile and 1-Year Outcome of Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Japan ― Insights From GARFIELD-AF ―
Yukihiro KoretsuneTakuma EtohYousuke KatsudaTetsuro SuetsuguKenshi KumedaIchiro SakumaKenichi EshimaMitsuhiro ShibuyaShin-ichi AndoNaoto YokotaShinya GotoKaren S. PieperJagan AlluAjay K. Kakkarfor the GARFIELD-AF Investigators
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML 早期公開
電子付録

論文ID: CJ-18-0655

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective non-interventional study of stroke prevention in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF (NAVF) that is being conducted in 35 countries.

Methods and Results: A total of 52,081 patients with a new diagnosis of NVAF were enrolled prospectively in GARFIELD-AF. Of these, 4859 (9.3%) were recruited in Japan (2010–2016). In cohort 1 (2010–2011), few patients were on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) globally. From cohort 2 onwards (2011–2016), however, there was a rapid increase in NOAC use around the globe, especially in Japan. By the last year of enrolment (2015–2016), 67.9% of patients in Japan and 43.1% of patients globally were on NOAC±antiplatelet therapy (AP). In Japan and globally, 17.0% and 12.2% of patients, respectively, did not receive stroke prevention treatment. Few patients in Japan (5.7%) received AP only. Compared with the other countries, the unadjusted rates of all-cause mortality and major bleeding were low, while rates of stroke/systemic embolism were similar after 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusions: GARFIELD-AF continues to provide important information on the homogeneity and heterogeneity of baseline characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed NVAF. This diversity reflects the differences in outcomes in Japan compared with the rest of the world.

著者関連情報
© 2018 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top