Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Improved Risk Stratification of Patients With Brugada Syndrome by the New Japanese Circulation Society Guideline ― A Multicenter Validation Study ―
Akinori WakamiyaTsukasa KamakuraTetsuji ShinoharaKenji YodogawaNobuyuki MurakoshiHiroshi MoritaNaohiko TakahashiYasuya IndenWataru ShimizuAkihiko NogamiMinoru HorieKenzaburo NakajimaNaoya KataokaMitsuru WadaKenichiro YamagataKohei IshibashiYuko InoueKoji MiyamotoSatoshi NagaseTakashi NodaTakeshi AibaSatoshi YasudaMasaki IedaKengo Kusano
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication
Supplementary material

Article ID: CJ-19-0910

Details
Abstract

Background:The new guideline (NG) published by the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) places emphasis on previous arrhythmic syncope and inducibility of ventricular fibrillation (VF) by ≤2 extrastimuli during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) for deciding the indication of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). This study evaluated the usefulness of the NG and compared it with the former guideline (FG) for risk stratification of patients with BrS.

Methods and Results:This was a multicenter (7 Japanese hospitals) retrospective study involving 234 patients with BrS who underwent PES at baseline (226 males; mean age at diagnosis: 44.9±13.4 years). At diagnosis, 46 patients (20%) had previous VF, 100 patients (43%) had previous syncope, and 88 patients (37%) were asymptomatic. We evaluated the difference in the incidence of VF in each indication according to the new and FGs. During the follow-up period (mean: 6.9±5.2 years), the incidence of VF was higher in patients with Class IIa indication according to the NG (NG: 16/45 patients [35.6%] vs. FG: 16/104 patients [15.4%]), while the incidence of VF in patients with other than class I or IIa indication was similarly low in both guidelines (NG: 2/143 patients [1.4%] vs. FG: 2/84 patients [2.4%]).

Conclusions:This study validated the usefulness of the NG for risk stratification of BrS patients.

Content from these authors
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top