Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Impact of Renal Dysfunction on Left Atrial Structural Remodeling and Recurrence After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation ― A Propensity Score Matching Analysis ―
Yuya TakahashiTakanori YamaguchiAkira FukuiToyokazu OtsuboKei HirotaYuki KawanoKana NakashimaMai TaharaTakayuki KitaiAtsushi KawaguchiNaohiko TakahashiKoichi Node
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML 早期公開

論文ID: CJ-20-0149

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background:Renal dysfunction coexists with other known risk factors of left atrial (LA) structural remodeling, expressed as low-voltage zones (LVZs), and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation. This study aimed to determine whether renal dysfunction had an independent effect on the presence of LVZs and recurrence after AF ablation, using propensity score (PS) matching analysis.

Methods and Results:448 consecutive patients who underwent their initial AF ablation were enrolled. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 126 (28%) patients having CKD. Using PS matching analysis, new subsets (CKD and non-CKD group, n=103 each) were obtained, matched for age, sex, AF type, and LA volume. The presence of LVZs defined as bipolar voltage <0.5 mV was higher in the CKD group than in the non-CKD group (31% vs. 17%, P=0.034). Multivariate analysis showed eGFR was an independent predictor of the presence of LVZs (odds ratio 1.31 per 10-mL/min/1.73 m2decrease, P=0.029). AF-free survival rate was significantly lower in the CKD patients during 20±9 months of follow-up (63% vs. 82%, P=0.019), and eGFR was shown to be an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio 1.29 per 10-mL/min/1.73 m2decrease, P=0.006), but the presence of LVZs did not predict recurrence.

Conclusions:Renal dysfunction independently predicted not only the recurrence of AF after ablation but also the presence of LVZs.

著者関連情報
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top