論文ID: CJ-21-0247
Background:The effects of catheter ablation (CA) energy sources on myocardial injury and coagulation biomarkers among Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban are unclear. This KYU-RABLE exploratory subanalysis compared the effects of CA using radiofrequency energy vs. cryoballoon on: (1) myocardial injury; and (2) plasma edoxaban and coagulation biomarker concentrations measured before and after CA.
Methods and Results:Plasma creatine kinase (CK), edoxaban, D-dimer, and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) concentrations within 1 h before CA were compared with concentrations the day after. All biomarkers increased after CA, regardless of the energy source, but especially with cryoballoon. Significantly higher increases in CK concentrations from before to the day after CA were seen with cryoballoon compared with radiofrequency energy (P<0.0001). Edoxaban concentrations were similar in both groups. Concentrations of D-dimer and F1+2 increased in both groups, but were significantly higher in the cryoballoon group (P<0.0001 and P=0.006, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of thrombotic or bleeding events.
Conclusions:Uninterrupted edoxaban concentrations were similar in both groups. Both myocardial injury and coagulation biomarkers increased after CA, especially with cryoballoon, but there was no difference in the incidence of thrombotic or bleeding events. These findings suggest the efficacy of uninterrupted edoxaban, regardless of the CA energy source. Periprocedural anticoagulation, particularly with cryoballoon, should be undertaken with care.
