Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Favorable Long-Term Outcomes After Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy in Japan
Yukichi Tokita Junya MatsudaYoichi Imori
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス HTML 早期公開

論文ID: CJ-23-0846

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex and relatively common genetic cardiac disease characterized by left or right ventricular hypertrophy, and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction based on cardiac hypertrophy. Approximately 30% of HCM patients have a significant LV pressure gradient (≥30 mmHg) at rest, and 60–70% of these patients are diagnosed with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) because an induced pressure gradient is also present. To relieve the LV outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO)-associated symptoms of HOCM patients, septal reduction therapy (SRT) is an effective option. SRT is a Class I indication for drug-refractory symptomatic HOCM with a LVOT gradient ≥50 mmHg, either at rest or after provocation.1 SRT includes septal myectomy (SM) and alcohol septal ablation (ASA).2

Article p ????

ASA was first introduced by Sigwart in 19953 and then rapidly and widely spread because it is a less invasive procedure than SM. However, a concern was the uncertain long-term durability of ASA. To date, there has been no evidence of long-term efficacy of ASA in Japanese HOCM patients, although reports on the long-term outcomes after ASA in countries other than Japan revealed that the long-term mortality rate after ASA was comparable to the expected survival for an age- and sex- comparable general population.4,5

In this issue of the Journal, Sawayama et al6 retrospectively investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after ASA for patients with HOCM at a single center in Japan. Their study revealed that the primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure) at 5 and 10 years was 16.5% and 25.6%, respectively, and all-cause death after ASA at 5 and 10 years was 15.1% and 28.9%, respectively, results that are comparable to those from previous foreign studies4,7,8 (all-cause death at 5 and 10 years, 8–11%, 18–26%, respectively). Thus the present study is the first to elucidate the long-term efficacy of ASA for Japanese HOCM patients.6

Although ASA was reported to have inferior long-term clinical outcomes compared with SM,9 recent meta-analyses have shown comparable long-term mortality rates between ASA and SM.1012 Because of these now favorable outcomes and being a less invasive procedure, ASA has become the primary SRT modality in many centers in Europe.13 Despite the present study revealing favorable outcomes after ASA for Japanese HOCM patients, it should be noted that the incidence of both permanent pacemaker implantation and reintervention was higher after ASA than SM; 5 of 42 patients (11%) required permanent pacemaker implantation.6 Even though ASA showed a comparable long-term mortality rate to SM, the heart team should discuss which SRT is suitable for the individual patient (Table).14

Table.

Discussion Points for the Heart Team to Determine Which Procedure Should Be Selected

  ASA preferred SM preferred
Age >40 years ≥40 years
Concomitant heart disease requiring surgery No Yes
Abnormal papillary muscle No Yes
Apical aneurysm No Yes
Appropriate target branch Yes No
Surgical risk Moderate or high Low
Target myocardium to be ablated or resected LVOT and/or mid ventricle Including apical portion
Moderate-severe MR that cannot be corrected by
SRT alone
No Yes

ASA, alcohol septal ablation; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; MR, mitral regurgitation; SM, septal myectomy; SRT, septal reduction therapy.

Discovering the predictors of long-term adverse events after ASA and to improve the postprocedural prognosis is challenging. Sawayama et al also elucidate that moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after ASA was significantly associated with the primary outcome. According to their result of multivariate analysis, residual significant MR after ASA was associated with the primary outcome independently of the systolic anterior movement (SAM) grade after ASA. This result suggests that in these patients, the etiology of MR might not only be SAM-related. If there is significant MR before ASA, it is important to assess its etiology (i.e., SAM-related MR only or combined with degenerative MR, atrial MR, or mitral valve prolapse) and discuss if ASA would improve MR sufficiently. There are several other predictors of long-term all-cause death after ASA reported in previous studies. A large ASA registry in Europe, the Euro-ASA registry reported that age at ASA, septal thickness before ASA, NYHA class before ASA, and the LVOT gradient at the last check-up were independent predictors of all-cause death in long-term.7

Foreign institutes have recently reported further long-term outcomes after ASA (≤20–25 years) and they reveal favorable very long-term outcomes (≈30% of all-cause deaths at 20 years).5,15 Longer and larger follow-up data in Japan is desired to definitively establish the efficacy of ASA.

References
 
© 2023, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top