Food Science and Technology Research
Online ISSN : 1881-3984
Print ISSN : 1344-6606
ISSN-L : 1344-6606
Original papers
Climate Effects on Flavonoid Content of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Leaves in Different Development Stages
Kexing SuTao ZhengHonglin ChenQun ZhangShuming Liu
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2020 年 26 巻 6 号 p. 805-812

詳細
Abstract

To investigate associations between meteorological parameters and flavonoid content of Zanthoxylum bungeanum leaves (ZBL) in different development stages, three cultivars of Meifengjaio, Shizitou, Qin'an Yihao were selected as experimental material. The flavonoid contents of ZBL were evaluated based on HPLC-MS technology (High Performance Liquid Chromatography - mass spectrograph). Results showed that the total flavonoid content of three ZBLs had significant difference, presented as Shizitou > Qin'an Yihao > Meifengjiao. However, its variation tendency remained nearly constant, with maximums between May and June, and lowest in August. Seven key flavonoids contents (quercitrin, hyperoside, afzelin, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, epicatechin, catechin, rutin.) were identified. The Pearson correlation analysis of 36 meteorological parameters and 7 flavonoids contents indicated that 16 meteorological significantly affected the flavonoid content in ZBL, of which temperature, water vapor pressure and other parameters were significantly negatively correlated with flavonoid content, and wind speed was significantly positive. Quercetin-3-O-glucoside, afzelin, epicatechin and catechin were significantly affected by meteorological parameters, while rutin, quercitrin and ghyperoside were less. Finally, we selected the total flavonoid content in Shizitou as representative to fit with 16 key meteorological parameters respectively, and obtained the specific relationship expression, which revealed the functional relationship between climate and total flavonoid content. This study provided a theoretical basis for the rational harvesting of ZBL and promoted the further development and utilization of it.

Introduction

Zanthoxylum bungeanum (Rutaceae), a deciduous small tree, is widely distributed in Asian countries (Zhang et al., 2017). China as the native of Z. bungeanum, its planting area and output are both the largest in the world (Chen et al., 2019). As one of the most important economic species, Z. bungeanum has been widely recognized for its medicinal and edible value (Shi et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2020). The pericarps, branches, roots, leaves of it are all medicine, which has been widely used to treat dyspepsia, eczema, toothache, and so on (Fan et al., 2019). In addition, it contains several types of compounds, including alkaloids, amides, volatile oil, lignans, flavones, fatty acids, sterols, terpenes, coumarins and hydrocarbons (Ji et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2014).

The mature leaves of Z. bungeanum were used as condiments in traditional Chinese cuisine, and the young leaves have been consumed as foodstuffs (Zhang et al., 2014a). In recent years, researchers have focused more on ZBL. Zhang and her group isolated and characterized nine flavonoids from the leaves of Z. bungeanum. Furthermore, they found quercitrin and hyperoside play crucial roles in the antioxidant activity (Zhang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2014b). Zhang and Wang demonstrated that hyperosides from ZBL exerted significant hepatocyte-protective and anti-hyperglycemic effects in mice with diabetes (Zhang et al., 2018). Li and coworkers found the extract of its leaves displayed a protective effect against lipid oxidation of salted fish (Li et al., 2015). Yang's research showed that there are lots of flavonoids in the extract of ZBL which have strong radical scavenging activities (Yang et al., 2013). Therefore, it has attracted researchers to pay more attention on flavonoids of ZBL.

Flavonoids can be roughly divided into six categories (flavanone, flavone, flavonol, flavanol, flavanonol, anthocyanin). And flavonoids have rich biological activities, such as anti-bacterial (Mahunu et al., 2018), anti-inflammatory (Li et al., 2020; Spagnuolo et al., 2018), anticancer (Ma et al., 2019), antidiabetic (Liu et al., 2018) and antioxidant activities (Su et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). According to previous studies, the flavonoids content in the skins and seeds of grapes were strongly influenced by the environment. The total anthocyanin, flavonol and flavan-3-ol contents in winter berry skins were significantly higher than those in summer berry skins (Oliveira et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2017). Furthermore, Katerina Biniari's research showed that the total phenolics (in grape skins and seeds), were closely linked to air temperature and wind speed (Biniari et al., 2020). Du and his group demonstrated that the accumulation of phenolic compounds was favored under summer conditions, while flavonoids accumulated under lower temperature (winter climate) conditions (Du et al., 2019).

However, they only roughly measured the impact of temperature changes on the content of flavonoids in each quarter, and few people further analyzed the relationship between them. Almost nobody combined climate parameters with ZBL. In our study, seven key flavonoids were detected in three varieties of ZBL, and 36 climate parameters were selected to analyze their relationship with flavonoids content. Our result reveals the correlation between climate and flavonoids and will help its further utilization.

Material and Methods

Meteorological Data    As shown in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, we collected the meteorological data from May to September 2017–2018, which contained 36 meteorological parameters (average air pressure, mean maximum air pressure, mean minimum air pressure, extreme maximum air pressure, extreme minimum air pressure, average temperature, mean maximum temperature, mean minimum temperature, extreme maximum temperature, extreme minimum temperature, mean vapor pressure, maximum vapor pressure, minimum vapor pressure, mean relative humidity, minimum relative humidity, total precipitation, maximum daily precipitation, mean ground temperature, mean maximum ground temperature, mean minimum ground temperature, extreme maximum ground temperature, extreme minimum ground temperature, ground temperature at 5 cm, ground temperature at 10 cm, ground temperature at 15 cm, ground temperature at 20 cm, ground temperature at 40 cm, ground temperature at 0.8 m, ground temperature at 1.6 m, ground temperature at 3.2 m, average wind speed, maximum wind speed, extreme wind speed, total sunshine hours, percentage of sunshine, actual sunshine hours). All meteorological data were gathered from Yangling Meteorological Bureau of Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province.

Plant Materials    We selected three cultivars of ZBL (Meifengjiao, Shizitou, Qin'an Yihao) as experimental material. The samples (9 years olds) were selected for uniformity in shape, size and color without signs of mechanical damage or disease, and collected at the same time of each month (May to September in 2017 and 2018). The leaves of the three cultivars are shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1.

Leaves of three cultivated varieties.

They were collected at the same height from a common garden (located in Northwest A and F University, Yangling District, Shaanxi Province, China) with three biological replicates. All samples of three varieties of Z. bungeanum were air-dried at home temperature in the dark. In the laboratory, the leaves were crushed with a grinder and turned into powder and stored at −20 °C.

Extraction and Determination of Flavonoids    In order to get better experimental results, we chose 80% methanol as the extraction solvent instead of ethanol using in traditional methods (Zhang et al., 2017). Air dried and powdered ZBL (1 g) were subjected to ultrasound-assisted extraction with 30 mL of 80% methanol at 40 °C for 40 min, and the extracts were collected and combined after filtration (Bhatt et al., 2017).

The flavonoid contents of ZBL were evaluated based on HPLC-MS (High Performance Liquid Chromatography - mass spectrometry) technology.

The chromatographic conditions used were as follows: The column was a Waters XSelect HSS T3 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.5 µm). Distilled-water-0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) were used as the mobile phase. The injection volume was 5 µL. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 30–50% B (0–15 min); 50–70% B (15–40 min); 70%–100% B (40–45 min); 100% B (45–60 min) and the flowrate is 0.3 mL/min with a temperature of 40 °C (Yang et al., 2013).

The mass spectrum condition: Using nitrogen as atomizing gas. All analysis was detected in the positive ionization mode using a spray voltage of 5 500 V, and the heated probe temperature and cone temperature were both kept at 550 °C (Schlatt et al., 2020).

Statistical Analysis    We used SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS for Windows, Base System User's Guide, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to do correlation analysis, using MATLAB R2012a software (MATLAB for Windows, Base System User's Guide, MathWorks. Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA) to draw thermodynamic diagram, bar and line chart.

Results

The composition and content of flavonoids    The HPLC-MS analysis identified 7 flavonoids in every Z. bungeanum varieties. They were afzelin, epicatechin, hyperoside, quercitrin, rutin, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, and catechin. Among all of them, quercitrin had the highest content, followed by hyperoside (Table 1), which means those two compositions were the dominant flavonoids compounds of ZBL. Our results were similar to Wu's, in addition, their research found those two compositions also play major roles in the antioxidant activity (Wu et al., 2018).

Table 1. The content of flavonoid components
Samples Contents (mean ± SD, mg·g−1) (n=3)
Afzelin Epicatechin Hyperoside Quercitrin Rutin Quercetin-3-O-glucoside catechin
M-2017-5 3.426±0.107 2.390±0.049 6.258±0.087 13.124±0.240 0.356±0.005 3.284±0.069 2.388±0.068
M-2017-6 2.307±0.068 3.554±0.096 6.904±0.099 12.782±0.205 0.440±0.014 1.855±0.053 1.509±0.061
M-2017-7 1.881±0.096 0.996±0.047 4.030±0.078 12.558±0.274 0.451±0.006 1.490±0.041 0.845±0.007
M-2017-8 1.790±0.042 1.594±0.086 4.894±0.130 12.032±0.405 0.394±0.004 1.628±0.045 0.639±0.018
M-2017-9 1.147±0.089 1.093±0.076 3.953±0.120 10.598±0.303 0.231±0.014 1.979±0.063 0.873±0.025
Q-2017-5 8.336±0.372 5.081±0.068 8.283±0.260 22.280±0.310 0.122±0.003 7.206±0.030 1.850±0.012
Q-2017-6 5.577±0.018 4.085±0.051 8.738±0.202 14.786±0.086 0.100±0.006 5.146±0.202 1.397±0.039
Q-2017-7 5.866±0.183 2.174±0.047 6.408±0.139 21.501±0.908 0.127±0.004 3.380±0.145 0.340±0.013
Q-2017-8 2.412±0.066 0.993±0.069 5.254±0.179   9.354±0.550 0.632±0.018 2.301±0.119 0.783±0.019
Q-2017-9 3.686±0.085 1.787±0.053 9.558±0.374 12.082±0.569 0.692±0.009 3.932±0.082 0.676±0.027
S-2017-5 7.986±0.127 7.604±0.177 6.609±0.106 21.760±0.608 0.249±0.010 6.646±0.098 6.494±0.076
S-2017-6 3.647±0.120 5.366±0.350 7.682±0.150 16.756±0.568 0.649±0.007 3.720±0.102 2.492±0.069
S-2017-7 3.310±0.113 4.554±0.172 8.330±0.085 17.640±0.377 0.555±0.006 4.201±0.158 3.260±0.113
S-2017-8 2.882±0.076 2.342±0.080 6.946±0.180 12.760±0.115 0.457±0.013 3.840±0.090 1.605±0.022
S-2017-9 2.465±0.068 3.518±0.083 6.182±0.119 17.576±0.270 0.445±0.005 4.464±0.049 5.957±0.106
M-2018-5 3.213±0.202 2.999±0.083 6.267±0.082 10.019±0.227 0.770±0.008 3.700±0.052 0.998±0.036
M-2018-6 2.231±0.147 2.525±0.168 5.554±0.048 14.305±0.378 0.273±0.008 1.778±0.096 1.105±0.068
M-2018-7 1.834±0.087 0.969±0.021 3.802±0.096 10.489±0.288 0.203±0.005 1.223±0,090 0.976±0.496
M-2018-8 2.022±0.040 1.268±0.085 3.188±0.071 12.782±0.238 0.235±0.007 1.267±0.051 0.818±0.071
M-2018-9 1.286±0.100 3.276±0.059 4.416±0.198   6.156±0.117 0.401±0.009 2.038±0.060 2.896±0.107
Q-2018-5 9.242±0.286 6.128±0.100 7.670±0.162 21.040±0.546 0.119±0.092 7.583±0.280 2.274±0.038
Q-2018-6 3.649±0.078 1.294±0.101 2.337±0.056 14.181±0.545 0.831±0.004 2.758±0.074 0.500±0.011
Q-2018-7 4.432±0.136 3.061±0.112 7.619±0.253 17.510±0.274 0.805±0.008 3.708±0.049 0.171±0.014
Q-2018-8 3.912±0.115 1.286±0.133 4.000±0.139   7.582±0.206 0.109±0.007 2.282±0.075 0.744±0.021
Q-2018-9 5.596±0.155 3.394±0.086 7.172±0.195 15.802±0.409 0.118±0.014 4.230±0.231 0.612±0.018
S-2018-5 6.182±0.110 8.358±0.188 7.920±0.069 18.354±0.414 0.128±0.015 7.114±0.120 6.258±0.093
S-2018-6 2.628±0.104 5.677±0.156 6.742±0.070 15.394±0.681 0.423±0.006 3.048±0.098 4.524±0.167
S-2018-7 1.873±0.112 5.344±0.322 5.758±0.016 17.950±0.402 0.541±0.013 3.646±0.188 4.678±0.163
S-2018-8 1.784±0.078 4.474±0.095 5.058±0.095   9.324±0.158 0.436±0.008 3.254±0.180 2.832±0.238
S-2018-9 2.500±0.083 4.692±0.231 5.067±0.086 18.038±0.107 0.614±0.007 4.762±0.217 5.382±0.083

The trend of total flavonoids content in 2017 and 2018 was basically similar (Figure 2). Shizitou had the highest content, Qin'an Yihao is the second, while Meifengjiao is the least. Combined with previous research (Sun et al., 2019), we speculated that this difference might be caused by different genes among varieties.

Fig. 2.

Histogram shows the changes of flavonoids content of each component from May to September in 2017 and 2018. M: Meifengjiao; Q: Qin'an Yihao; S: Shizitou.

In addition, the total flavonoids content of Shizitou and Qin'an Yihao had similar wave trends, highest in May and lowest in August. However, Meifengjiao was different from them, as its highest content of flavonoids was between May and June, while lowest in September. This might be due to Meifengjiao ripening later than Shizitou and Qin'an Yihao.

Correlation analysis of flavonoids and climate parameters    Based on the correlation analysis of SPSS, the heatmap of 7 flavonoids in each variety with climate change were obtained by using Origin drawing (Figure 3). Study showed the relationships between flavonoids and climate were similar in three varieties of Zanthoxylum bungeanum. Rutin, quercitrin and hyperoside were less affected by climate, while quercetin-3-O-glucoside, afzelin, epicatechin and catechin were highly correlated with some meteorological parameters.

Fig. 3.

Heat map of the correlation between flavonoids and meteorological parameters. Blue stands for negative correlation; Red stands for positive correlation.

In Katerina Biniari's research, they speculated some key meteorological parameters correlates positively or negatively with other climate parameters, thus resulting in the correlation of flavonoids to those climatic parameters (Biniari et al., 2020). Our study found those key meteorological parameters containing vapor pressure, ground temperature and wind speed.

According to Figure 3, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, afzelin, epicatechin and catechin had a significant negative correlation with vapor pressure (mean vapor pressure, maximum vapor pressure, minimum vapor pressure), ground temperature (ground temperature at 40 cm, ground temperature at 0.8 m, ground temperature at 1.6 m, ground temperature at 3.2 m) and other meteorological parameters (mean minimum temperature, extreme minimum temperature, mean ground temperature, extreme minimum ground temperature), the correlation coefficient more than 0.45, even high to 0.86. And they had a positive correlation with wind speed (average wind speed, maximum wind speed, extreme wind speed), the correlation is about 0.5.

It appears that the mean and extreme minimum temperature were more likely to affect the flavonoid's content than the mean or extreme maximum temperature, while deep ground temperature was easier to affect the content of flavonoids than shallow ground temperature.

Meteorological effect the content of total flavonoids    Through the above correlation analysis results, 16 meteorological parameters with high correlation were selected for further analysis. And we chose Shizitou, the highest total flavonoids content variety, to match with 16 meteorological parameters, the results were exhibited in Figure 4.

Fig. 4.

The fitting results of 16 meteorological parameters and total flavonoids content in Shizitou. Green stands for negative correlation. Red stands for positive correlation.

The green fitting curve represents that the total content of flavonoids was negatively correlated with it, while the red fitting curve showed the positive correlation. The abscissa represented the total content of flavonoids, and the ordinate represents the value of each meteorological factor.

According to Figure 4, the wind speed was in direct proportion to the total flavonoids content, while the air temperature and vapor pressure were in inverse proportion to the total flavonoids content. What's more, the change trend of total flavone content with weather was the same as that of each flavonoid component with weather.

Our results were partially similar to what Yu Xiaofeng and his team explored in mulberry leaves that lower temperature had a significant positive effect on the accumulation of total flavonoids (Yu et al., 2016). In addition, previously reported the flavonoids were negatively correlated with the precipitation, and positively correlated with the sunshine hours. This also agreed with our research results (Sun et al., 1997).

The Principal Component Analysis    The Principal Component Analysis was further used to demonstrate the correlation between the climatic parameters and total flavonoids content (Biniari et al., 2020).

The PCA 95% confidence ellipse and its loading plot are presented in Figure 5. It appears that air temperature correlates positively with vapor pressure and ground temperature, thus resulting in the correlation of the flavonoids content to those climatic parameters. In addition, we speculated that higher wind speed can reduce the temperature and humidity of leaf surface, which indirectly affects the ZBL flavonoids content.

Fig. 5.

Evaluation of the links between the prevailing climatic parameters and their effect on the flavonoids content.

Discussion

Some researches focused on the influence of meteorological factors on the accumulation of secondary metabolites in plants. Olha Mykhailenko and his team found that sunshine duration had a significant positive effect on the accumulation of phenolic compounds in Iris species (Mykhailenko et al., 2020). In Yang's study, they speculated that the accumulation of phenolic compounds was a complicated biosynthetic process and different environmental conditions could regulate the expression of the relative genes and proteins, which resulted in the same mulberry cultivars with different phenolic compositions. And Sven W. Meckelmann got the same conclusion in his work (Meckelmann et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2017). Our research concentrated on ZBL which had been widely used as medicine, due to its rich flavonoids (He et al., 2016). We found that places with low ground temperature, low vapor pressure and high wind speed were helpful to the accumulation of flavonoids in ZBL. Our conclusions were consistent with other researchers' studies on mulberry and onions. Their results generally showed that temperature, rainfall and humidity as significant parameters, was negatively correlated with the accumulation of flavonoids (Rodrigues et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2019).

Conclusions

In summary, our study was designed to extract different flavonoids components from ZBL, and investigated their relationship with meteorological parameters. Results found that the suitable picking time of ZBL was on June. And places with low ground temperature, low vapor pressure and high wind speed might be helpful to the accumulation of flavonoids in its leaves. Among seven key flavonoids, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, afzelin, epicatechin and catechin were highly correlated with meteorological, while the others were less affected by climate, which facilitated targeted harvesting as needed. In addition, the fitting results of total flavonoids could be used to estimate the content in different climatic conditions. This paper provides was helpful for the further development and utilization of Zanthoxylum bungeanum leaves.

Acknowledgements    This article was supported by the project “the demonstration and promotion of efficient cultivation and management techniques of Zanthoxylum bungeanum in Hanyuan Weibei (No. [2017]18).”

Appendices
Table 2. Abbreviation of meteorological parameters
Symbol Full Title Symbol Full Title
AP Atmospheric Pressure RH_1 Mean Relative Humidity
AT Air Temperature RH_2 Minimum Relative Humidity
VP Vapor Pressure P_1 Total Precipitation
RH Relative Humidity P_2 Maximum Daily Precipitation
P Precipitation GT_1 Mean Ground Temperature
GT Ground Temperature GT_2 Mean Maximum Ground Temperature
SG Shallow Geothermal GT_3 Mean Minimum Ground Temperature
DG Deep Geothermal GT_4 Extreme Maximum Ground Temperature
WS Wind Speed GT_5 Extreme Minimum Ground Temperature
SD Sunshine Duration SG_1 Ground Temperature at 5cm
AP_1 Average Air Pressure SG_2 Ground Temperature at 10cm
AP_2 Mean Maximum Air Pressure SG_3 Ground Temperature at 15cm
AP_3 Mean Minimum Air Pressure SG_4 Ground Temperature at 20cm
AP_4 Extreme Maximum Air Pressure SG_5 Ground Temperature at 40cm
AP_5 Extreme Minimum Air Pressure DG_1 Ground Temperature at 0.8m
AT_1 Average Temperature DG_2 Ground Temperature at 1.6m
AT_2 Mean Maximum Temperature DG_3 Ground Temperature at 3.2m
AT_3 Mean Minimum Temperature WS_1 Average Wind Speed
AT_4 Extreme Maximum Temperature WS_2 Maximum Wind Speed
AT_5 Extreme Minimum Temperature WS_3 Extreme Wind Speed
VP_1 Mean Vapor Pressure SD_1 Total Sunshine Hours
VP_2 Maximum Vapor Pressure SD_2 Percentage of Sunshine
VP_3 Minimum Vapor Pressure SD_3 Actual Sunshine Hours
Table 3. Monthly meteorological data
months May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18
AP AP_1 9521 9469 9442 9480 9532 9505 9461 9441 9465 556
AP_2 9548 9490 9463 9501 9551 9533 9481 9457 9484 9577
AP_3 9483 9443 9413 9454 9511 9466 9433 9418 9437 9530
AP_4 9654 9539 9527 9597 9608 9652 9569 9494 9537 9641
AP_5 9402 9388 9379 9386 9473 9342 9375 9386 9405 9449
AT AT_1 199 244 290 247 199 198 246 266 271 189
AT_2 274 304 358 298 247 257 307 313 329 243
AT_3 135 187 227 206 165 145 189 230 226 153
AT_4 349 352 419 372 301 337 373 375 360 320
AT_5 67 148 185 147 113 87 119 199 175 87
VP VP_1 134 179 222 224 193 149 193 264 260 169
VP_2 217 234 305 297 233 237 305 340 313 270
VP_3 41 77 120 143 114 63 58 186 189 94
RH RH_1 60 62 58 75 84 67 64 78 74 79
RH_2 10 14 13 24 25 15 12 35 39 26
P P_1 597 1330 485 797 1053 427 764 1362 1645 642
P_2 220 621 221 317 343 128 252 433 845 250
GT GT_1 242 295 354 286 219 241 292 313 331 220
GT_2 459 488 573 449 340 430 486 485 537 359
GT_3 124 182 221 205 161 134 178 229 224 153
GT_4 628 639 688 702 499 602 619 650 651 588
GT_5 56 142 170 157 116 68 112 200 174 75
SG SG_1 228 274 329 276 218 225 272 295 308 219
SG_2 225 270 325 276 218 221 266 290 304 221
SG_3 222 266 320 277 220 218 262 286 302 225
SG_4 218 262 316 277 221 215 258 283 299 228
SG_5 177 221 264 259 220 192 227 262 279 234
DG DG_1 163 203 242 252 221 177 209 244 265 239
DG_2 144 175 206 226 216 153 179 208 234 233
DG_3 133 145 160 176 185 134 147 162 178 191
WS WS_1 19 17 17 17 13 17 17 15 13 14
WS_2 108 84 73 66 75 118 77 55 93 71
WS_3 172 163 156 121 130 203 137 113 156 112
SD SD_1 2339 2466 3143 1724 888 1684 1483 1453 2586 1297
SD_2 54 57 72 42 24 39 34 33 62 35
SD_3 1263 1405 2262 724 213 656 504 479 1603 453
References
 
© 2020 by Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology
feedback
Top