Journal of Applied Glycoscience
Online ISSN : 1880-7291
Print ISSN : 1344-7882
ISSN-L : 1344-7882
Proceedings of the Symposium on Amylases and Related Enzymes, 2008
Structural Comparison of Streptococcus mutans Dextran Glucosidase with Glucoside Hydrolases in GH13
Hironori HondohHiroaki Otsuka-RachiWataru SaburiHaruhide MoriMasayuki OkuyamaAtsuo Kimura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 56 Issue 2 Pages 111-117

Details
Abstract

In glycoside hydrorase family (GH) 13, α-glucosidase, oligo-1,6-glucosidase and dextran glucosidase, which hydrolyze the non-reducing end glucosidic linkages of maltooligo- and/or isomaltoolligosaccharides, are categorized as α-glucoside hydrolase. Despite a high similarity in the sequence and overall structure of those family enzymes, GH 13 α-glucoside hydrolases show a wide range of substrate specificity. Until now, three crystal structures of α-glucoside hydrolase, dextran glucosidase from Streptococcus mutans (DGase), oligo-1,6-glucosidase from Bacillus cereus (O16G), and α-glucosidase from Geobacillus sp. HTA-462 (GSJ) have been determined. In this study, we have performed the structural comparison of these α-glucoside hydrolases. Their overall structures are generally similar, and consist of three major domains A, B and C as found in many α-amylase family enzymes. The significant structural differences in these enzymes are mainly found in loop regions. GSJ has a shorter β→α loop 6 in a different orientation in addition to the disordered regions, whereas DGase and O16G show high similarity in their tertiary structures. Though these enzymes have the different substrate preference, they all possess the completely conserved configuration at subsite -1. Therefore, the substrate preference will be originated from the structure at subsite for the reducing end side of substrate. The substrate binding modes of these glucoside hydrolases were predicted by superimposing the substrate molecule of substrate-complex structures of DGase and α-amylase. DGase and O16G are thought to have a similar manner in substrate binding with conserved amino acid residues. The substrate recognition of GSJ at subsite -1 and +1 would be similar to that of α-amylases since the key residues in substrate binding are conserved in both primary and tertiary structures.

Content from these authors
© 2009 by The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top