抄録
This study examined the significance and challenges of publicly-funded juku schools as local government-led learning support projects. The rationale underlying direct subsidy policies for private tutoring schools is understandable, but they are only feasible in financially-strong urban areas. With the rising costs of tutoring fees, the issue of setting upper fee limits has arisen. The establishment of publicly-funded juku schools, while supportive of local education, may inadvertently encourage the outflow of children from local areas. These initiatives stem from the entrenched notion that families must bear the costs of private education, such as tutoring fees.
In this context, the offering of publicly-funded juku schools, as free or low-cost educational options outside of standard schooling, is viewed as attractive by citizens, and this perception drives the administration’s decision-making plans on school funding. However, the nationwide expansion of these cram schools could lead to the loss of their uniqueness and prestige, potentially rendering them meaningless.
Keywords: Cram school, Juku, Publicly-Funded Juku Schools
