抄録
Kyoto Protocol was issued on february 16th, 2005. The purpose of this paper is to consider the meaning of global environmental politics. The meaning is recognized as formation of antagonism. From view point of Luhmann's concepts of risk and immunization, we will classify the issues of global environmental conferences. First, we review the politicization process of global environmental issue and examine the Kyoto Protocol.COP3 reconfirmed the North-South responsabilities. Second, we analize the Johannesburg Summit (WSSD) in comparison to the Rio Summit. WSSD adressed the plan of implementation containing targets and timetable to improve the poverty and condition of environment. From view point of risk, WSSD concerns only calcurable risk and immunization without structural reformation, since the summit did not adopt the Precautionary Principle and preserved the WTO regime. Third,we consider the attempt of World Social Forum (WSF).WSF demonstrates the path to sustainable development and social economic justice, which were made slight of in WSSD. To be sure, WSF questions the divide between risk winner and risk loser. Although the propositions of WSF are introduced into functional system as programme arrangement, the participants of WSF suggest above the functional management, seeking the possibily of Another World against the world of neoliberal globalization. Finally, we suggest that possibilty of Another World relies on impossibility of risk imputation.
